Difference between revisions of "Christopher Monckton"

From RCwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Articles)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
== Articles ==
 
== Articles ==
 +
 +
[http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton/monckton_rebutted.html Response to Author Smith's Critique of Christopher Monckton's "Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered"] Christopher Monckton, Science and Public Policy Institute, 05 August 2008
 +
 +
 +
'''Rebuttals'''
 +
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
 +
[http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton/chuck_it_again_schmidt.html Chuck it again, Schmidt! A Response to Gavin Schmidt’s Critique of Monckton’s “Climate Sensitivity reconsidered”] Christopher Monckton, Science and Public Policy Institute, July 29, 2008
 +
 +
 +
'''Rebuttals'''
 +
 +
*[http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2008/07/monckton_flunks_latin.php#comment-1032463 Monckton flunks Latin] Tim Lambert, Deltoid, July 31, 2008
 +
*[http://helicity.wordpress.com/2008/07/30/whats_in_a_rebuttal/ What’s In a Rebuttal?] Helicity, Helicity, July 30, 2008
 +
 +
----
  
  
 
American Physical Society paper: [http://www.aps.org/units/fps/newsletters/200807/monckton.cfm Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered] Physics & Society: July 2008
 
American Physical Society paper: [http://www.aps.org/units/fps/newsletters/200807/monckton.cfm Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered] Physics & Society: July 2008
 +
  
 
'''Rebuttals:'''
 
'''Rebuttals:'''

Revision as of 20:47, 17 August 2008

Profile

Articles

Response to Author Smith's Critique of Christopher Monckton's "Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered" Christopher Monckton, Science and Public Policy Institute, 05 August 2008


Rebuttals




Chuck it again, Schmidt! A Response to Gavin Schmidt’s Critique of Monckton’s “Climate Sensitivity reconsidered” Christopher Monckton, Science and Public Policy Institute, July 29, 2008


Rebuttals



American Physical Society paper: Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered Physics & Society: July 2008


Rebuttals:




Climate chaos? Don't believe it, Sunday Telegraph (UK), 5 Nov 2006

Wrong problem, wrong solution, Sunday Telegraph (UK), 12 Nov 2006

Rebuttals: