Ferenc Miskolczi - Revision history

Admin at 13:45, 29 May 2011

Admin — Sun, 29 May 2011 13:45:29 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 13:45, 29 May 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Van Dorland, R and Forster, P, 2010, [http://www.realclimate.org/docs/Rebuttal_Miskolczi_20100927.pdf Rebuttal of Miskolczi’s alternative greenhouse theory] ([http://www.realclimate.org/docs/Rebuttal_Miskolczi_Layperson_20100927.pdf Layperson summary])		Van Dorland, R and Forster, P, 2010, [http://www.realclimate.org/docs/Rebuttal_Miskolczi_20100927.pdf Rebuttal of Miskolczi’s alternative greenhouse theory] ([http://www.realclimate.org/docs/Rebuttal_Miskolczi_Layperson_20100927.pdf Layperson summary])

-	Science of Doom, April-May 2011	+	Science of Doom, April-May 2011:
	*[http://scienceofdoom.com/2011/04/22/the-mystery-of-tau-miskolczi/ The Mystery of Tau - Miskolczi Part I]		*[http://scienceofdoom.com/2011/04/22/the-mystery-of-tau-miskolczi/ The Mystery of Tau - Miskolczi Part I]
	*[http://scienceofdoom.com/2011/04/25/the-mystery-of-tau-miskolczi-part-two-kirchhoff/ The Mystery of Tau - Miskolczi Part II]		*[http://scienceofdoom.com/2011/04/25/the-mystery-of-tau-miskolczi-part-two-kirchhoff/ The Mystery of Tau - Miskolczi Part II]

Admin at 13:45, 29 May 2011

Admin — Sun, 29 May 2011 13:45:17 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 13:45, 29 May 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Van Dorland, R and Forster, P, 2010, [http://www.realclimate.org/docs/Rebuttal_Miskolczi_20100927.pdf Rebuttal of Miskolczi’s alternative greenhouse theory] ([http://www.realclimate.org/docs/Rebuttal_Miskolczi_Layperson_20100927.pdf Layperson summary])		Van Dorland, R and Forster, P, 2010, [http://www.realclimate.org/docs/Rebuttal_Miskolczi_20100927.pdf Rebuttal of Miskolczi’s alternative greenhouse theory] ([http://www.realclimate.org/docs/Rebuttal_Miskolczi_Layperson_20100927.pdf Layperson summary])

-	*[http://scienceofdoom.com/2011/04/22/the-mystery-of-tau-miskolczi/ The Mystery of Tau - Miskolczi] Science of Doom, April 22, 2011	+	Science of Doom, April-May 2011
-	*[http://scienceofdoom.com/2011/04/25/the-mystery-of-tau-miskolczi-part-two-kirchhoff/ The Mystery of Tau - Miskolczi Part II] Science of Doom, April 25, 2011	+	*[http://scienceofdoom.com/2011/04/22/the-mystery-of-tau-miskolczi/ The Mystery of Tau - Miskolczi Part I]
-	*[http://scienceofdoom.com/2011/04/26/the-mystery-of-tau-%e2%80%93-miskolczi-%e2%80%93-part-three-kinetic-energy/ The Mystery of Tau - Miskolczi Part III] Science of Doom, April 26, 2011	+	*[http://scienceofdoom.com/2011/04/25/the-mystery-of-tau-miskolczi-part-two-kirchhoff/ The Mystery of Tau - Miskolczi Part II]
-	*[http://scienceofdoom.com/2011/05/01/the-mystery-of-tau-%e2%80%93-miskolczi-%e2%80%93-part-four-%e2%80%93-emissivity/ The Mystery of Tau - Miskolczi Part IV] Science of Doom, May 1, 2011	+	*[http://scienceofdoom.com/2011/04/26/the-mystery-of-tau-%e2%80%93-miskolczi-%e2%80%93-part-three-kinetic-energy/ The Mystery of Tau - Miskolczi Part III]
-	*[http://scienceofdoom.com/2011/05/15/the-mystery-of-tau-%e2%80%93-miskolczi-%e2%80%93-part-five-equation-souffle/ The Mystery of Tau - Miskolczi Part V] Science of Doom, May 15, 2011	+	*[http://scienceofdoom.com/2011/05/01/the-mystery-of-tau-%e2%80%93-miskolczi-%e2%80%93-part-four-%e2%80%93-emissivity/ The Mystery of Tau - Miskolczi Part IV]
-	*[http://scienceofdoom.com/2011/05/28/the-mystery-of-tau-%e2%80%93-miskolczi-part-six-minor-ghgs/ The Mystery of Tau - Miskolczi Part VI] Science of Doom, May 28, 2011	+	*[http://scienceofdoom.com/2011/05/15/the-mystery-of-tau-%e2%80%93-miskolczi-%e2%80%93-part-five-equation-souffle/ The Mystery of Tau - Miskolczi Part V]
		+	*[http://scienceofdoom.com/2011/05/28/the-mystery-of-tau-%e2%80%93-miskolczi-part-six-minor-ghgs/ The Mystery of Tau - Miskolczi Part VI]

Admin at 13:43, 29 May 2011

Admin — Sun, 29 May 2011 13:43:53 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 13:43, 29 May 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Miskolczi, Ferenc M. 2010. "THE STABLE STATIONARY VALUE OF THE EARTH'S GLOBAL AVERAGE ATMOSPHERIC PLANCK-WEIGHTED GREENHOUSE-GAS OPTICAL THICKNESS", Energy and Environment, 21, 243-262 [http://www.friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/E&E_21_4_2010_08-miskolczi.pdf (pdf)]		Miskolczi, Ferenc M. 2010. "THE STABLE STATIONARY VALUE OF THE EARTH'S GLOBAL AVERAGE ATMOSPHERIC PLANCK-WEIGHTED GREENHOUSE-GAS OPTICAL THICKNESS", Energy and Environment, 21, 243-262 [http://www.friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/E&E_21_4_2010_08-miskolczi.pdf (pdf)]

-	==Rebuttal==	+	==Rebuttals==

	Van Dorland, R and Forster, P, 2010, [http://www.realclimate.org/docs/Rebuttal_Miskolczi_20100927.pdf Rebuttal of Miskolczi’s alternative greenhouse theory] ([http://www.realclimate.org/docs/Rebuttal_Miskolczi_Layperson_20100927.pdf Layperson summary])		Van Dorland, R and Forster, P, 2010, [http://www.realclimate.org/docs/Rebuttal_Miskolczi_20100927.pdf Rebuttal of Miskolczi’s alternative greenhouse theory] ([http://www.realclimate.org/docs/Rebuttal_Miskolczi_Layperson_20100927.pdf Layperson summary])

-	==Comments==	+	*[http://scienceofdoom.com/2011/04/22/the-mystery-of-tau-miskolczi/ The Mystery of Tau - Miskolczi] Science of Doom, April 22, 2011
		+	*[http://scienceofdoom.com/2011/04/25/the-mystery-of-tau-miskolczi-part-two-kirchhoff/ The Mystery of Tau - Miskolczi Part II] Science of Doom, April 25, 2011
		+	*[http://scienceofdoom.com/2011/04/26/the-mystery-of-tau-%e2%80%93-miskolczi-%e2%80%93-part-three-kinetic-energy/ The Mystery of Tau - Miskolczi Part III] Science of Doom, April 26, 2011
		+	*[http://scienceofdoom.com/2011/05/01/the-mystery-of-tau-%e2%80%93-miskolczi-%e2%80%93-part-four-%e2%80%93-emissivity/ The Mystery of Tau - Miskolczi Part IV] Science of Doom, May 1, 2011
		+	*[http://scienceofdoom.com/2011/05/15/the-mystery-of-tau-%e2%80%93-miskolczi-%e2%80%93-part-five-equation-souffle/ The Mystery of Tau - Miskolczi Part V] Science of Doom, May 15, 2011
		+	*[http://scienceofdoom.com/2011/05/28/the-mystery-of-tau-%e2%80%93-miskolczi-part-six-minor-ghgs/ The Mystery of Tau - Miskolczi Part VI] Science of Doom, May 28, 2011
		+
		+
		+	==Other Comments==

	*[http://www.drroyspencer.com/2010/08/comments-on-miskolczi%E2%80%99s-2010-controversial-greenhouse-theory/ Comments on Miskolczi’s (2010) Controversial Greenhouse Theory] Roy Spencer, Aug 5 2010		*[http://www.drroyspencer.com/2010/08/comments-on-miskolczi%E2%80%99s-2010-controversial-greenhouse-theory/ Comments on Miskolczi’s (2010) Controversial Greenhouse Theory] Roy Spencer, Aug 5 2010

Admin: /* Comments */

Admin — Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:31:18 GMT

Comments

←Older revision		Revision as of 19:31, 30 November 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:

	*[http://www.drroyspencer.com/2010/08/comments-on-miskolczi%E2%80%99s-2010-controversial-greenhouse-theory/ Comments on Miskolczi’s (2010) Controversial Greenhouse Theory] Roy Spencer, Aug 5 2010		*[http://www.drroyspencer.com/2010/08/comments-on-miskolczi%E2%80%99s-2010-controversial-greenhouse-theory/ Comments on Miskolczi’s (2010) Controversial Greenhouse Theory] Roy Spencer, Aug 5 2010
-	*[http://www.realclimate.org/docs/Barrett_FM_crit_Mar2010.docx Some criticisms from Jack Barrett] (.docx format) 2010	+	*[http://www.realclimate.org/docs/JB_version2.pdf Further Modification of JB’s criticism of the FM Paper] Jack Barrett (Nov 2010)
	*[http://rabett.blogspot.com/2010/03/eli-can-retire-part-ii-so-much-for.html EPA response to comments on the Endangerment finding] (via ER) Mar 2010		*[http://rabett.blogspot.com/2010/03/eli-can-retire-part-ii-so-much-for.html EPA response to comments on the Endangerment finding] (via ER) Mar 2010
	*[http://rabett.blogspot.com/2008/06/gigo-eli-has-learned-over-years-that.html GIGO] (ER) Jun 2008		*[http://rabett.blogspot.com/2008/06/gigo-eli-has-learned-over-years-that.html GIGO] (ER) Jun 2008

Admin at 13:09, 9 November 2010

Admin — Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:09:50 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 13:09, 9 November 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	==Rebuttal==		==Rebuttal==

-	Van Dorland, R and Forster, P, 2010, [Rebuttal of Miskolczi’s alternative greenhouse theory http://www.realclimate.org/docs/Rebuttal_Miskolczi_20100927.pdf"] ([Layperson summary http://www.realclimate.org/docs/Rebuttal_Miskolczi_Layperson_20100927.pdf])	+	Van Dorland, R and Forster, P, 2010, [http://www.realclimate.org/docs/Rebuttal_Miskolczi_20100927.pdf Rebuttal of Miskolczi’s alternative greenhouse theory] ([http://www.realclimate.org/docs/Rebuttal_Miskolczi_Layperson_20100927.pdf Layperson summary])
-		+

	==Comments==		==Comments==

Admin at 13:09, 9 November 2010

Admin — Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:09:09 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 13:09, 9 November 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Miskolczi, Ferenc M. 2010. "THE STABLE STATIONARY VALUE OF THE EARTH'S GLOBAL AVERAGE ATMOSPHERIC PLANCK-WEIGHTED GREENHOUSE-GAS OPTICAL THICKNESS", Energy and Environment, 21, 243-262 [http://www.friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/E&E_21_4_2010_08-miskolczi.pdf (pdf)]		Miskolczi, Ferenc M. 2010. "THE STABLE STATIONARY VALUE OF THE EARTH'S GLOBAL AVERAGE ATMOSPHERIC PLANCK-WEIGHTED GREENHOUSE-GAS OPTICAL THICKNESS", Energy and Environment, 21, 243-262 [http://www.friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/E&E_21_4_2010_08-miskolczi.pdf (pdf)]

-	==Rebuttals==	+	==Rebuttal==
		+
		+	Van Dorland, R and Forster, P, 2010, [Rebuttal of Miskolczi’s alternative greenhouse theory http://www.realclimate.org/docs/Rebuttal_Miskolczi_20100927.pdf"] ([Layperson summary http://www.realclimate.org/docs/Rebuttal_Miskolczi_Layperson_20100927.pdf])
		+
		+
		+	==Comments==

	*[http://www.drroyspencer.com/2010/08/comments-on-miskolczi%E2%80%99s-2010-controversial-greenhouse-theory/ Comments on Miskolczi’s (2010) Controversial Greenhouse Theory] Roy Spencer, Aug 5 2010		*[http://www.drroyspencer.com/2010/08/comments-on-miskolczi%E2%80%99s-2010-controversial-greenhouse-theory/ Comments on Miskolczi’s (2010) Controversial Greenhouse Theory] Roy Spencer, Aug 5 2010

Admin at 14:55, 13 August 2010

Admin — Fri, 13 Aug 2010 14:55:24 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 14:55, 13 August 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	*[http://www.geocities.com/bpl1960/Miskolczi.html Why Miskolczi is wrong] (BPL)		*[http://www.geocities.com/bpl1960/Miskolczi.html Why Miskolczi is wrong] (BPL)

-	==Summary of Main Issues==	+	==Summary of Main Issues in the 2007 paper==

	[http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/06/26/debate-thread-miskolczi-semi-transparent-atmosphere-model/#comment-21353 from Nick Stokes] Jun 2008		[http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/06/26/debate-thread-miskolczi-semi-transparent-atmosphere-model/#comment-21353 from Nick Stokes] Jun 2008

Admin at 14:44, 13 August 2010

Admin — Fri, 13 Aug 2010 14:44:09 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 14:44, 13 August 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Miskolczi, Ferenc M. 2007. "Greenhouse Effect in Semi-Transparent Planetary Atmospheres." Időjárás 111, 1-40 [http://hps.elte.hu/~zagoni/Miskolczi%20-%20Idojaras%202007%20Jan-March.pdf (pdf)]		Miskolczi, Ferenc M. 2007. "Greenhouse Effect in Semi-Transparent Planetary Atmospheres." Időjárás 111, 1-40 [http://hps.elte.hu/~zagoni/Miskolczi%20-%20Idojaras%202007%20Jan-March.pdf (pdf)]
		+
		+	Miskolczi, Ferenc M. 2010. "THE STABLE STATIONARY VALUE OF THE EARTH'S GLOBAL AVERAGE ATMOSPHERIC PLANCK-WEIGHTED GREENHOUSE-GAS OPTICAL THICKNESS", Energy and Environment, 21, 243-262 [http://www.friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/E&E_21_4_2010_08-miskolczi.pdf (pdf)]

	==Rebuttals==		==Rebuttals==

		+	*[http://www.drroyspencer.com/2010/08/comments-on-miskolczi%E2%80%99s-2010-controversial-greenhouse-theory/ Comments on Miskolczi’s (2010) Controversial Greenhouse Theory] Roy Spencer, Aug 5 2010
		+	*[http://www.realclimate.org/docs/Barrett_FM_crit_Mar2010.docx Some criticisms from Jack Barrett] (.docx format) 2010
		+	*[http://rabett.blogspot.com/2010/03/eli-can-retire-part-ii-so-much-for.html EPA response to comments on the Endangerment finding] (via ER) Mar 2010
		+	*[http://rabett.blogspot.com/2008/06/gigo-eli-has-learned-over-years-that.html GIGO] (ER) Jun 2008
	*[http://www.geocities.com/bpl1960/Miskolczi.html Why Miskolczi is wrong] (BPL)		*[http://www.geocities.com/bpl1960/Miskolczi.html Why Miskolczi is wrong] (BPL)
-	*[http://rabett.blogspot.com/2008/06/gigo-eli-has-learned-over-years-that.html GIGO] (ER)
-	*[http://www.realclimate.org/docs/Barrett_FM_crit_Mar2010.docx Some criticisms from Jack Barrett] (.docx format)
-	*[http://rabett.blogspot.com/2010/03/eli-can-retire-part-ii-so-much-for.html EPA response to comments on the Endangerment finding] (via ER)

	==Summary of Main Issues==		==Summary of Main Issues==

-	[http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/06/26/debate-thread-miskolczi-semi-transparent-atmosphere-model/#comment-21353 from Nick Stokes]	+	[http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/06/26/debate-thread-miskolczi-semi-transparent-atmosphere-model/#comment-21353 from Nick Stokes] Jun 2008

	1. The whole theme of the analysis as something that undermines current AGW practice is wrong. Dr Miskolczi’s modelling is of a gray-body atmosphere (no spectral lines or shapes). No GCM or practical climate study would use such an assumption, or use any gray-body theory due to Milne. A gray-body model is sometimes used for teaching purposes to convey concepts.		1. The whole theme of the analysis as something that undermines current AGW practice is wrong. Dr Miskolczi’s modelling is of a gray-body atmosphere (no spectral lines or shapes). No GCM or practical climate study would use such an assumption, or use any gray-body theory due to Milne. A gray-body model is sometimes used for teaching purposes to convey concepts.

Admin: /* Rebuttals */

Admin — Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:11:53 GMT

Rebuttals

←Older revision		Revision as of 17:11, 1 April 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:
	*[http://rabett.blogspot.com/2008/06/gigo-eli-has-learned-over-years-that.html GIGO] (ER)		*[http://rabett.blogspot.com/2008/06/gigo-eli-has-learned-over-years-that.html GIGO] (ER)
	*[http://www.realclimate.org/docs/Barrett_FM_crit_Mar2010.docx Some criticisms from Jack Barrett] (.docx format)		*[http://www.realclimate.org/docs/Barrett_FM_crit_Mar2010.docx Some criticisms from Jack Barrett] (.docx format)
-		+	*[http://rabett.blogspot.com/2010/03/eli-can-retire-part-ii-so-much-for.html EPA response to comments on the Endangerment finding] (via ER)

	==Summary of Main Issues==		==Summary of Main Issues==

Admin at 19:58, 29 March 2010

Admin — Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:58:53 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 19:58, 29 March 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	*[http://www.geocities.com/bpl1960/Miskolczi.html Why Miskolczi is wrong] (BPL)		*[http://www.geocities.com/bpl1960/Miskolczi.html Why Miskolczi is wrong] (BPL)
	*[http://rabett.blogspot.com/2008/06/gigo-eli-has-learned-over-years-that.html GIGO] (ER)		*[http://rabett.blogspot.com/2008/06/gigo-eli-has-learned-over-years-that.html GIGO] (ER)
-	*[http://www.realclimate.org/docs/Barrett_FM_crit_Mar2010.docx Some criticisms from Jack Barrett]	+	*[http://www.realclimate.org/docs/Barrett_FM_crit_Mar2010.docx Some criticisms from Jack Barrett] (.docx format)