Difference between revisions of "George Will"

From RCwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Articles)
(Articles)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
*[http://www.cjr.org/the_observatory/the_george_will_affair.php The George Will Affair] Columbia Journalism Review, February 26, 2009  
 
*[http://www.cjr.org/the_observatory/the_george_will_affair.php The George Will Affair] Columbia Journalism Review, February 26, 2009  
 
*[http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/27/expers-big-flaw-in-wills-ice-assertions/#more-729 Ombudsman: Flaw in Will's Ice Assertions] Dot Earth, February 27, 2009
 
*[http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/27/expers-big-flaw-in-wills-ice-assertions/#more-729 Ombudsman: Flaw in Will's Ice Assertions] Dot Earth, February 27, 2009
 +
 +
'''Ombudsman statement'''
 +
 +
*[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2009/02/27/ST2009022702494.html The Heat From a Global Warming Column] Andrew Alexander, Washington Post, March 1, 2009
 +
  
 
----
 
----

Revision as of 18:17, 28 February 2009

Articles

Dark Green Doomsayers Washington Post, February 15, 2009

Rebuttals

Follow-up

Climate Science in a Tornado Washington Post, February 27, 2009

More Rebuttals

Ombudsman statement



Let Cooler Heads Prevail, Washington Post, April 2, 2006

Rebuttals



Global Warming? Hot Air, Washington Post, Dec 22, 2004. (Also other syndicated outlets).

Rebuttals