George Will

From RCwiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 22:52, 28 February 2009 (edit)
Admin (Talk | contribs)
(Articles)
← Previous diff
Current revision (19:36, 13 July 2009) (edit)
Sethbaum (Talk | contribs)
(Cosmetic grammar change)
 
Line 9: Line 9:
*[http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/02/where_theres_a_george_will_theres_a_way_to_deny_gl.php Where there's a (George) Will There's A Way ... To Deny Global Warming] TPM, February 16, 2009 *[http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/02/where_theres_a_george_will_theres_a_way_to_deny_gl.php Where there's a (George) Will There's A Way ... To Deny Global Warming] TPM, February 16, 2009
*[http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/02/16/george-will-liberated-from-the-burden-of-fact-checking/ George Will liberated from the burden of fact checking] The Loom, February 16, 2009 *[http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/02/16/george-will-liberated-from-the-burden-of-fact-checking/ George Will liberated from the burden of fact checking] The Loom, February 16, 2009
 +*[http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2009/feb/18/climate-denial-george-will George Will's climate howlers] George Monbiot, The Guardian, February 18, 2009
 +*[http://www.yaleclimatemediaforum.org/2009/03/george-wills-analysis-sea-ice/ Sorting Through George Will’s Analysis; What the Sea Ice Data Actually Tells Us] Zeke Hausfather, March 5, 2009
'''Follow-up''' '''Follow-up'''
Line 28: Line 30:
*[http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/02/28/ice-ice-baby-when-fact-checking-is-not-fact-checking/ Ice, Ice Baby: When Fact-Checking Is Not Fact-Checking] The Loom, March 1, 2009 *[http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/02/28/ice-ice-baby-when-fact-checking-is-not-fact-checking/ Ice, Ice Baby: When Fact-Checking Is Not Fact-Checking] The Loom, March 1, 2009
 +'''Meta rebuttal'''
 +
 +*[http://thingsbreak.wordpress.com/2009/02/20/waiting-for-wapo/ Waiting for WaPo] The Way Things Break, February 20, 2009
 +
 +'''Washington Post Rebuttals'''
 +
 +*[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/20/AR2009032002660.html?sub=AR Climate Change Myths and Facts] Chris Mooney, March 21, 2009
 +*[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/20/AR2009032003191.html?sub=AR Understanding Climate Change] Michel Jarraud, March 21, 2009
Line 41: Line 51:
---- ----
-[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A20998-2004Dec22.html Global Warming? Hot Air], Washington Post, Dec 22, 2004. (Also other syndicated outlets).+[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A20998-2004Dec22.html Global Warming? Hot Air], Washington Post, Dec 22, 2004. (Also other syndicated outlets.)
'''Rebuttals''' '''Rebuttals'''

Current revision

Articles

Dark Green Doomsayers Washington Post, February 15, 2009

Rebuttals

Follow-up

Climate Science in a Tornado Washington Post, February 27, 2009

More Rebuttals

Ombudsman statement

Yet more rebuttals

Meta rebuttal

Washington Post Rebuttals



Let Cooler Heads Prevail, Washington Post, April 2, 2006

Rebuttals



Global Warming? Hot Air, Washington Post, Dec 22, 2004. (Also other syndicated outlets.)

Rebuttals

Personal tools