John McLean, C. R. de Freitas, and R. M. Carter

(Difference between revisions)

Revision as of 10:49, 29 July 2009

Rebuttals

Mother nature’s sons Gareth Renowden, Hot Topic, July 25, 2009

Old News Tamino, Open Mind, July 24, 2009

Is our whole dissembly appeared? Mike Kaulbars, Greenfyre's, July 24, 2009

If She Weighs the Same as a Duck, She's Made of Wood Michael Tobis, Only in it for the Gold, July 23, 2009

How not to analyze climate data Robert Grumbine, More Grumbine Science, July 27, 2009

Editorial standards at AGU journals James Annan, James' Empty Blog, July 27, 2009

Revision as of 10:42, 29 July 2009 (edit) Mattandrews (Talk \| contribs) (add Grumbine rebuttal) ← Previous diff		Revision as of 10:49, 29 July 2009 (edit) Mattandrews (Talk \| contribs) (add James Annan rebuttal re step-function ridiculousness) Next diff →
Line 15:		Line 15:

	[http://moregrumbinescience.blogspot.com/2009/07/how-not-to-analyze-climate-data.html How not to analyze climate data] Robert Grumbine, More Grumbine Science, July 27, 2009		[http://moregrumbinescience.blogspot.com/2009/07/how-not-to-analyze-climate-data.html How not to analyze climate data] Robert Grumbine, More Grumbine Science, July 27, 2009
		+
		+	[http://julesandjames.blogspot.com/2009/07/editorial-standards-at-agu-journals.html Editorial standards at AGU journals] James Annan, James' Empty Blog, July 27, 2009