Richard Lindzen
From RCwiki
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 04:24, 19 August 2008 (edit) Greenfyre (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 13:54, 6 October 2008 (edit) Greenfyre (Talk | contribs) Next diff → |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Articles == | == Articles == | ||
| + | |||
| + | [http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0809/0809.3762.pdf Climate Science: Is it currently designed to answer questions?] September 27, 2008 | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''Rebuttals:''' | ||
| + | *[http://wah-realitycheck.blogspot.com/2008/09/politicize-climate-science.html Politicizing Climate Science] Werner Aeschbach-Hertig, Reality Check, 04 October 2008 | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[http://initforthegold.blogspot.com/2008/09/lindzen-diatribe.html Lindzen Diatribe] Michael Tobis, Only In It For The Gold, September 23, 2008 | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| [http://www.newsweek.com/id/35543 Why So Gloomy?] Newsweek, April 16, 2007 | [http://www.newsweek.com/id/35543 Why So Gloomy?] Newsweek, April 16, 2007 | ||
Revision as of 13:54, 6 October 2008
Articles
Climate Science: Is it currently designed to answer questions? September 27, 2008
Rebuttals:
- Politicizing Climate Science Werner Aeschbach-Hertig, Reality Check, 04 October 2008
- Lindzen Diatribe Michael Tobis, Only In It For The Gold, September 23, 2008
Why So Gloomy? Newsweek, April 16, 2007
Rebuttals:
- Newsweek blesses Richard Lindzen, ignores pay-offs from fuel companies Kit Stolz, Grist, 27 Apr 2007
Climate of Fear, Wall Street Journal, April 12, 2006
Rebuttals:
- "Ambiguous scientific statements about climate are hyped by those with a vested interest in alarm" Jim Hoggan, DeSmogBlog,12 Oct 06
- Lindzen: Point by point Daniel Kirk-Davidoff, RealClimate, 13 April 2006
- Open Thread on Lindzen Op-Ed in WSJ Group, RealClimate, 12 April 2006
Economic Affairs - Minutes of Evidence House of Lords UK, JANUARY 25 2005
Rebuttals:
- Richard Lindzen’s HoL testimony Gavin Schmidt, RealClimate, February 14 2006
