Talk:RC Wiki
From RCwiki
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 21:00, 10 August 2008 (edit) Greenfyre (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 21:01, 10 August 2008 (edit) Greenfyre (Talk | contribs) Next diff → |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| It also begs the question about what catagories are useful? How likely is someone to be searching by the name of the newspaper? and is the search function sufficient? | It also begs the question about what catagories are useful? How likely is someone to be searching by the name of the newspaper? and is the search function sufficient? | ||
| - | I do not pose the question to be difficult, but more with an eye to the fact that catagorization takes time, particularly as they add a layer of decision making re: conventions (eg is Swindle 'Television' or 'Documentary' or both? | + | I do not pose the question to be difficult, but more with an eye to the fact that catagorization takes time, particularly as they add a layer of decision making re: conventions (eg is Swindle 'Television' or 'Documentary' or both?} |
| If a catagory is used to help people find a resource quicker, then by all means - but is it used? | If a catagory is used to help people find a resource quicker, then by all means - but is it used? | ||
Revision as of 21:01, 10 August 2008
Source Country
I wonder how useful the source country section is? It is not a criteria I have ever used to look for material, but maybe others do.
It also begs the question about what catagories are useful? How likely is someone to be searching by the name of the newspaper? and is the search function sufficient?
I do not pose the question to be difficult, but more with an eye to the fact that catagorization takes time, particularly as they add a layer of decision making re: conventions (eg is Swindle 'Television' or 'Documentary' or both?}
If a catagory is used to help people find a resource quicker, then by all means - but is it used?
