Difference between revisions of "Water vapor accounts for almost all of the greenhouse effect"

From RCwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
 
(One intermediate revision by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
*[http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/12/22/222357/40 'Water vapor accounts for almost all of the greenhouse effect'] Coby Beck, Grist: "How to talk to a Climate Skeptic"
+
*[http://scienceblogs.com/illconsidered/2006/01/water-vapor-is-almost-all-of.php 'Water vapor accounts for almost all of the greenhouse effect'] Coby Beck "How to Talk to a Climate Skeptic"
  
 
*[http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2005/04/water-vapour-feedback-or-forcing/ Water vapour: feedback or forcing?] Real Climate
 
*[http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2005/04/water-vapour-feedback-or-forcing/ Water vapour: feedback or forcing?] Real Climate
  
*[http://scholarsandrogues.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/anti-global-heating-claims-a-reasonably-thorough-debunking/#m18 Myth #18: Water vapor is a more powerful greenhouse gas than CO2, and since humans have almost no direct impact on the amount of water vapor in the air, humans can’t be the cause of global heating.] Brian Angliss, Scholars and Rogues: "Anti-global heating claims - a reasonably thorough debunking"
+
*[http://scholarsandrogues.com/2007/07/23/anti-global-heating-claims-a-reasonably-thorough-debunking/#m18 Myth #18: Water vapor is a more powerful greenhouse gas than CO2, and since humans have almost no direct impact on the amount of water vapor in the air, humans can’t be the cause of global heating.] Brian Angliss, Scholars and Rogues: "Anti-global heating claims - a reasonably thorough debunking"
  
 
*[http://www.skepticalscience.com/Evaporating-the-water-vapor-argument.html Evaporating the water vapor argument] Skeptical Science
 
*[http://www.skepticalscience.com/Evaporating-the-water-vapor-argument.html Evaporating the water vapor argument] Skeptical Science

Latest revision as of 18:46, 4 December 2008