{"id":24833,"date":"2023-05-29T21:06:11","date_gmt":"2023-05-30T02:06:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/?page_id=24833"},"modified":"2026-01-19T22:32:44","modified_gmt":"2026-01-20T03:32:44","slug":"surface-temperature-graphics","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/surface-temperature-graphics\/","title":{"rendered":"Surface temperature graphics"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kcite-section\" kcite-section-id=\"24833\">\n\n<p>This page is a repository of graphs we&#8217;ve made related to the surface (and near surface) temperature records, along with some description of what was done. Graphs will be updated as time goes by, and as datasets undergo revisions, or as new datasets are produced. This is not comprehensive, but it does comprise of graphs that we&#8217;ve found useful to come back to over the years.  As with all graphics here, you can use these anywhere as long as there is credit and a link back here.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image is-resized\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/images\/\/compare-obs_plus.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-26320 lazyload\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 2934px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 2934\/1879;\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Multiple independent global surface temperature products show a very coherent pattern of change over time. While there is overlap in the weather station inputs and ocean data, the methods for the correcting for missing data, inhomogeneities, spatial sampling etc. are independent. <em>[<a href=\"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2023\/01\/2022-updates-to-the-temperature-records\/\" title=\"2022 updates to the temperature records\">Last discussed.<\/a> Updated: Jan 2026] <\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/images\/\/cmp_surf_sat-3.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-26324 lazyload\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 2934px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 2934\/1879;\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">There are now multiple surface and near-surface temperature products. Those that are based on in situ weather stations (as above in the previous graph) are the most commonly shown, but there are also reanalyses (ERA5 and JRA-3Q) that assimilate real time data from a range of sources, and direct satellite retrievals of either ground temperature anomalies (AIRS) or the tropospheric lower temperature (TLT) (from RSS\/UAH\/NOAA STAR). While all products show a clear warming since 1979 (or 2003 for AIRS), there are structural issues that can cause a spread in the trends, more so for the satellites than the in situ records. <em>[<a href=\"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2023\/04\/a-noaa-star-dataset-is-born\/\" title=\"A NOAA-STAR dataset is born\u2026\">Last Discussion<\/a>, updated: Jan 2026].<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/images\/\/enso_ann.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-26317 lazyload\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 2934px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 2934\/1879;\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">The most important source of interannual variability in the surface temperature record relates to the El Ni\u00f1o\/Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Most (but not all) warm records are associated with a positive phase (El Ni\u00f1o). This graph codes each calendar year anomaly by the state of ENSO in Feb\/Mar of that year. ENSO index is the Nino34 <em>(<a href=\"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2023\/01\/2022-updates-to-the-temperature-records\/\" title=\"2022 updates to the temperature records\">Last discussed<\/a>, Updated Jan 2026)<\/em>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1490\" height=\"980\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/images\/\/Screenshot-2026-01-19-at-10.31.13-PM.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-26325 lazyload\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/images\/Screenshot-2026-01-19-at-10.31.13-PM.png 1490w, https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/images\/Screenshot-2026-01-19-at-10.31.13-PM-300x197.png 300w, https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/images\/Screenshot-2026-01-19-at-10.31.13-PM-600x395.png 600w, https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/images\/Screenshot-2026-01-19-at-10.31.13-PM-150x99.png 150w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 1490px) 100vw, 1490px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 1490px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 1490\/980;\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">The impact of ENSO can be (usually!) removed statistically which more clearly reveals the impacts of the three biggest recent volcanoes and the long term trends. The ENSO corrected index is the residual after removing the statistical impact of the Feb\/Mar ENSO index from the Nino34 <em>(<a href=\"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2024\/01\/annual-gmsat-predictions-and-enso\/\" title=\"Annual GMSAT predictions and ENSO\">Last discussed<\/a>, Updated Jan 2026)<\/em>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"2919\" height=\"2157\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/images\/\/compare_obs_raw.png\" alt=\"Comparison of global temperature estimates using raw (unadjusted) data and the data adjusted for non-climatic factors. The trends just using the raw data are larger. \" class=\"wp-image-24840 lazyload\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/images\/compare_obs_raw.png 2919w, https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/images\/compare_obs_raw-300x222.png 300w, https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/images\/compare_obs_raw-600x443.png 600w, https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/images\/compare_obs_raw-1536x1135.png 1536w, https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/images\/compare_obs_raw-2048x1513.png 2048w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 2919px) 100vw, 2919px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 2919px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 2919\/2157;\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">There are multiple inhomogeneities in the ocean and weather station records &#8211; due to instrument or practice changes, station moves, time of observation bias etc. The net effect of these adjustments is to reduce the long term trends in the global mean (which is dominated by the shifts in ocean temperature measurement practices. &#8216;Raw data&#8217;-based reconstruction from Zeke Hausfather.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div><!-- kcite active, but no citations found -->\n<\/div> <!-- kcite-section 24833 -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This page is a repository of graphs we&#8217;ve made related to the surface (and near surface) temperature records, along with some description of what was done. Graphs will be updated as time goes by, and as datasets undergo revisions, or as new datasets are produced. This is not comprehensive, but it does comprise of graphs [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":24648,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":{"0":"post-24833","1":"page","2":"type-page","3":"status-publish","4":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"entry"},"aioseo_notices":[],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/24833","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24833"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/24833\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":26326,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/24833\/revisions\/26326"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/24648"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24833"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}