{"id":17081,"date":"2014-03-22T12:06:28","date_gmt":"2014-03-22T17:06:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/?p=17081"},"modified":"2014-03-22T12:06:28","modified_gmt":"2014-03-22T17:06:28","slug":"how-many-cans","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2014\/03\/how-many-cans\/","title":{"rendered":"How Many Cans?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kcite-section\" kcite-section-id=\"17081\">\n<p>XKCD, the brilliant and hilarious on-line comic, attempts to answer the question <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/what-if.xkcd.com\/88\/\">How much CO<sub>2<\/sub> is contained in the world&#8217;s stock of bottled fizzy drinks? How much soda would be needed to bring atmospheric CO<sub>2<\/sub> back to preindustrial levels?<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The answer is, enough to cover the Earth with 10 layers of soda cans.  However, the comic misses a factor of about two, which would arise from the ocean.  The oceans have been taking up carbon throughout the industrial era, as have some parts of the land surface biosphere.  The ocean contains about half of the carbon we&#8217;ve ever released from fossil fuels.  We&#8217;ve also cut down a lot of trees, which has been more-or-less compensated for by uptake into other parts of the land biosphere.  So as a fraction of our total carbon footprint (fuels + trees) the oceans contain about a third.    <\/p>\n<p>At any rate, the oceans are acting as a CO<sub>2<\/sub> buffer, meaning that it&#8217;s absorbing CO<sub>2<\/sub> as it tries to limit the change to the atmospheric concentration.  If we suddenly pulled atmospheric CO<sub>2<\/sub> back down to 280 ppm (by putting it all in cans of soda perhaps), the oceans would work in the opposite direction, to buffer our present-day higher concentration by giving up CO<sub>2<\/sub>.  The land biosphere is kind of a loose cannon in the carbon cycle, hard to predict what it will do.<\/p>\n<p>Ten layers of soda cans covering the whole earth sounds like a lot.  But most of a soda can is soda, rather than CO<sub>2<\/sub>.  Here&#8217;s another statistic: If the CO<sub>2<\/sub> in the atmosphere were to freeze out as dry ice depositing on the ground, the dry ice layer would only be about 7 millimeters thick.  I guess cans of soda pop might not be the most efficient or economical means of CO<sub>2<\/sub> sequestration.  For a better option, look to saline aquifers, which are porous geological formations containing salty water that no one would want to drink or irrigate with anyway.  CO<sub>2<\/sub> at high pressure forms a liquid, then ultimately reacts with igneous rocks to form CaCO<sub>3<\/sub>.  <\/p>\n<p>Further Reading<\/p>\n<p>Tans, Pieter.  An accounting of the observed increase in oceanic and atmospheric CO2 and<br \/>\nan outlook for the Future.  Oceanography 22(4) 26-35, 2009<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ipcc.ch\/pdf\/special-reports\/srccs\/srccs_wholereport.pdf\">Carbon dioxide capture and storage<\/a> IPCC Report, 2005<\/p>\n<!-- kcite active, but no citations found -->\n<\/div> <!-- kcite-section 17081 -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>XKCD, the brilliant and hilarious on-line comic, attempts to answer the question How much CO2 is contained in the world&#8217;s stock of bottled fizzy drinks? How much soda would be needed to bring atmospheric CO2 back to preindustrial levels? The answer is, enough to cover the Earth with 10 layers of soda cans. However, the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":41,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-17081","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-climate-science","7":"entry"},"aioseo_notices":[],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17081","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/41"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17081"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17081\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17091,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17081\/revisions\/17091"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17081"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17081"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17081"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}