{"id":209,"date":"2005-11-11T18:03:54","date_gmt":"2005-11-11T22:03:54","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=209"},"modified":"2005-12-10T19:24:08","modified_gmt":"2005-12-10T23:24:08","slug":"update-on-2005-temperatures","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2005\/11\/update-on-2005-temperatures\/","title":{"rendered":"Update on 2005 temperatures <lang_fr>Mise \u00e0 Jour sur les temp\u00e9ratures 2005<\/lang_fr>"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kcite-section\" kcite-section-id=\"209\">\n<p>Further to our <a href=\"http:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php?p=196\">post<\/a> about whether 2005 will be a year of record warmth, Jim Hansen has put out a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.columbia.edu\/~jeh1\/GlobalTemperatures_03Nov2005.pdf\">brief discussion<\/a> on the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/10\/12\/AR2005101202498.html?referrer=email&#038;referrer=email\">Washington Post report<\/a> and some of the subsequent discussion.  One minor clarification to his statements is that the reporter involved (Juliet Eilperin) did in fact leave messages for the relevant people at GISS (including me) prior to publication, but sometimes people can just be difficult to track down.  Oh&#8230;.and for those who are counting, with the preliminary October data in, 2005 has pulled ahead of 1998 in both the GISS land based met. station index (0.76 to 0.73\u00b0C) and the GISS land-ocean index (0.59 to 0.58\u00b0C). All previous caveats still apply&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p><lang_fr>En compl\u00e9ment du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php?p=196\">message<\/a> sur le record de temp\u00e9rature possible de l&#8217;ann\u00e9e 2005, Jim Hansen a \u00e9crit une <a href=\"http:\/\/www.columbia.edu\/~jeh1\/GlobalTemperatures_03Nov2005.pdf\">courte discussion (en anglais)<\/a> sur l&#8217;article du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/10\/12\/AR2005101202498.html?referrer=email&#038;referrer=email\">Washington Post report<\/a> et des discussions sur cet article. Et pour le record, avec les donn\u00e9es disponibles d&#8217;octobre, 2005 est pass\u00e9 devant 1998 dans les deux types de donn\u00e9es du GISS, l&#8217;index &#8220;GISS land&#8221; sur des stations m\u00e9t\u00e9o terrestres (0.76 compar\u00e9 a 0.73\u00b0C) ainsi que pour l&#8217;index &#8220;GISS land-ocean&#8221; (0.59 to 0.58\u00b0C). Les mises en garde pr\u00e9c\u00e9dentes sont toujours valables&#8230;<\/lang_fr><\/p>\n<!-- kcite active, but no citations found -->\n<\/div> <!-- kcite-section 209 -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Further to our post about whether 2005 will be a year of record warmth, Jim Hansen has put out a brief discussion on the Washington Post report and some of the subsequent discussion. One minor clarification to his statements is that the reporter involved (Juliet Eilperin) did in fact leave messages for the relevant people [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1,9],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-209","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-climate-science","7":"category-instrumental-record","8":"entry"},"aioseo_notices":[],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}