{"id":2177,"date":"2009-12-02T09:31:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-02T14:31:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/?p=2177"},"modified":"2010-07-27T10:28:38","modified_gmt":"2010-07-27T15:28:38","slug":"cru-hack-more-context","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2009\/12\/cru-hack-more-context\/","title":{"rendered":"CRU Hack: More context"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Continuation of the older<\/a> threads<\/a>. Please scan those (even briefly) to see whether your point has already been dealt with. Let me know if there is something worth pulling from the comments to the main post.<\/p>\n

In the meantime, read about why peer-review is a necessary but not sufficient condition<\/a> for science to be worth looking at. Also, before you conclude that the emails have any impact on the science, read about the six easy steps<\/a> that mean that CO2 (and the other greenhouse gases) are indeed likely to be a problem, and think specifically how anything in the emails affect them. <\/p>\n

Update:<\/strong> The piece by Peter Kelemen at Columbia in Popular Mechanics<\/a> is quite sensible, even if I don’t agree in all particulars.<\/p>\n

Further update:<\/strong> Nature’s editorial<\/a>. <\/p>\n

Further, further update:<\/strong> Ben Santer’s mail<\/a> (click on quoted text), the Mike Hulme op-ed<\/a>, and Kevin Trenberth<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n<\/div> ","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Continuation of the older threads. Please scan those (even briefly) to see whether your point has already been dealt with. Let me know if there is something worth pulling from the comments to the main post. In the meantime, read about why peer-review is a necessary but not sufficient condition for science to be worth […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1,9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2177","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-climate-science","category-instrumental-record","entry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t