{"id":3846,"date":"2010-04-14T08:21:56","date_gmt":"2010-04-14T13:21:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/?p=3846"},"modified":"2010-07-27T10:16:50","modified_gmt":"2010-07-27T15:16:50","slug":"second-cru-inquiry-reports","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2010\/04\/second-cru-inquiry-reports\/","title":{"rendered":"Second CRU inquiry reports"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kcite-section\" kcite-section-id=\"3846\">\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.uea.ac.uk\/mac\/comm\/media\/press\/CRUstatements\/Report+of+the+Science+Assessment+Panel\">Oxburgh report<\/a> on the science done at the CRU has now been published and&#8230;.. as in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2010\/03\/first-cru-inquiry-report-released\/\">first inquiry<\/a>, they find no scientific misconduct, no impropriety and no tailoring of the results to a preconceived agenda, though they do suggest more statisticians should have been involved. They have also some choice words to describe the critics.<\/p>\n<p>Carry on&#8230;<\/p>\n<!-- kcite active, but no citations found -->\n<\/div> <!-- kcite-section 3846 -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Oxburgh report on the science done at the CRU has now been published and&#8230;.. as in the first inquiry, they find no scientific misconduct, no impropriety and no tailoring of the results to a preconceived agenda, though they do suggest more statisticians should have been involved. They have also some choice words to describe [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1,9],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-3846","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-climate-science","7":"category-instrumental-record","8":"entry"},"aioseo_notices":[],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3846","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3846"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3846\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4629,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3846\/revisions\/4629"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3846"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3846"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3846"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}