{"id":470,"date":"2007-09-06T21:20:12","date_gmt":"2007-09-07T02:20:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2007\/09\/friday-roundup-3\/"},"modified":"2007-10-08T08:32:01","modified_gmt":"2007-10-08T13:32:01","slug":"friday-roundup-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2007\/09\/friday-roundup-3\/","title":{"rendered":"Friday roundup"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Schwartz in the news again<\/strong>:
\nStephen Schwartz of Brookhaven National Laboratory makes our weekly roundup again<\/a> this week. This time, its for a comment\/reply<\/a> in the latest issue of Nature<\/em> concerning a previously published Nature<\/em> piece \u201cQuantifying climate change \u2014 too rosy a picture?\u201d by Schwartz et al<\/em>. In the original piece, Schwartz and co-authors argue that the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) presents an overly confident assessment of climate sensitivity and potential future climate change. In the response by Forster et al<\/em>, a number of IPCC lead authors point out that the Schwartz et al<\/em> critique ignores or misinterprets several key IPCC findings. <\/p>\n

update:<\/strong> if you don’t have a subscription, the original Schwartz et al Nature<\/em> article is available here<\/a> and the recent comment\/reply is available here<\/a><\/small><\/p>\n

update #2:<\/strong> It has been pointed out to us that the commentary by Stephen Schwartz and co-authors was published on the Nature Reports<\/em> Climate Change website, rather than in the print journal Nature<\/em>.
\n<\/small><\/p>\n\n<\/div> ","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Schwartz in the news again: Stephen Schwartz of Brookhaven National Laboratory makes our weekly roundup again this week. This time, its for a comment\/reply in the latest issue of Nature concerning a previously published Nature piece \u201cQuantifying climate change \u2014 too rosy a picture?\u201d by Schwartz et al. In the original piece, Schwartz and co-authors […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-470","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-climate-science","entry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t