{"id":496,"date":"2007-11-08T13:19:42","date_gmt":"2007-11-08T18:19:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2007\/11\/did-we-call-it-or-what\/"},"modified":"2007-12-26T17:17:45","modified_gmt":"2007-12-26T22:17:45","slug":"did-we-call-it-or-what","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2007\/11\/did-we-call-it-or-what\/","title":{"rendered":"Did we call it or what"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Steve Milloy has let fly<\/a> with the results of his twisted survey of climate scientists, pretty much as we expected<\/a>. It’s not worth analyzing in any great depth, I’m sure we all have better ways to spend our time, but one tidbit jumped out at me. <\/p>\n

The first question of the survey was <\/p>\n

Which best describes the reason(s) for climate change?<\/i>. <\/p>\n

The survey offered a choice between human activity or natural variation, or some combination of the two. How to answer this? Before a few decades ago, natural variability was the right answer, but since about 1970, human activity has taken over. <\/p>\n

I emailed Milloy with my concern about the indeterminate time scope of the question, and he replied<\/p>\n

\nHi David,<\/p>\n

Present tense verbs imply ongoing climate change.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

but now from the press release, <\/p>\n

Another notable result is that an astounding 20% of those surveyed said that human activity is the principal driver of climate change.<\/p>\n

“So was there no climate change before mankind?” Milloy asked.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The rest is more of the same. Garbage in, trash talk out. OK, back to work, enough time wasted on this. <\/p>\n\n<\/div> ","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Steve Milloy has let fly with the results of his twisted survey of climate scientists, pretty much as we expected. It’s not worth analyzing in any great depth, I’m sure we all have better ways to spend our time, but one tidbit jumped out at me.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":41,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-496","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-climate-science","7":"entry"},"aioseo_notices":[],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/496","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/41"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=496"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/496\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=496"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=496"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=496"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}