{"id":665,"date":"2009-04-01T18:01:45","date_gmt":"2009-04-01T23:01:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2009\/04\/advocacy-vs-science\/"},"modified":"2009-05-01T07:59:17","modified_gmt":"2009-05-01T12:59:17","slug":"advocacy-vs-science","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2009\/04\/advocacy-vs-science\/","title":{"rendered":"Advocacy vs. Science"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kcite-section\" kcite-section-id=\"665\">\n<p>The advocate will pick up any piece of apparently useful data and without doing any analysis, decide that their pet theory perfectly explains any anomaly without consideration of any alternative explanations. Their conclusion is always that their original theory is correct.<\/p>\n<p>The scientist will look at all possibilities and revise their thinking based on a thorough assessment of all issues &#8211; data quality, model quality and appropriateness of the the comparison. Their conclusion follows from the analysis whatever it points to.<\/p>\n<p>Which <a href=\"http:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/2009\/03\/30\/lindzen-on-negative-climate-feedback\/\">one<\/a> is <a href=\"http:\/\/chriscolose.wordpress.com\/2009\/03\/31\/lindzen-on-climate-feedback\">which<\/a>?<\/p>\n<!-- kcite active, but no citations found -->\n<\/div> <!-- kcite-section 665 -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The advocate will pick up any piece of apparently useful data and without doing any analysis, decide that their pet theory perfectly explains any anomaly without consideration of any alternative explanations. Their conclusion is always that their original theory is correct. The scientist will look at all possibilities and revise their thinking based on a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-665","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-climate-science","entry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 4.9.8 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"RealClimate: The advocate will pick up any piece of apparently useful data and without doing any analysis, decide that their pet theory perfectly explains any anomaly without consideration of any alternative explanations. Their conclusion is always that their original theory is correct. The scientist will look at all possibilities and revise their thinking based on a\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Gavin\"\/>\n\t<meta name=\"google-site-verification\" content=\"5-5cpEuryTX8bKt_pnL8bRcqfVflejqKS-2UK8aSA3c\" \/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2009\/04\/advocacy-vs-science\/\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 4.9.8\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"RealClimate | Climate science from climate scientists...\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"RealClimate: Advocacy vs. Science\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"RealClimate: The advocate will pick up any piece of apparently useful data and without doing any analysis, decide that their pet theory perfectly explains any anomaly without consideration of any alternative explanations. Their conclusion is always that their original theory is correct. The scientist will look at all possibilities and revise their thinking based on a\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2009\/04\/advocacy-vs-science\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-04-01T23:01:45+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2009-05-01T12:59:17+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ClimateOfGavin\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"RealClimate: Advocacy vs. Science\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RealClimate: The advocate will pick up any piece of apparently useful data and without doing any analysis, decide that their pet theory perfectly explains any anomaly without consideration of any alternative explanations. Their conclusion is always that their original theory is correct. The scientist will look at all possibilities and revise their thinking based on a\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ClimateOfGavin\" \/>\n\t\t<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"aioseo-schema\">\n\t\t\t{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/index.php\\\/archives\\\/2009\\\/04\\\/advocacy-vs-science\\\/#article\",\"name\":\"RealClimate: Advocacy vs. Science\",\"headline\":\"Advocacy vs. Science\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/index.php\\\/archives\\\/author\\\/gavin\\\/#author\"},\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/images\\\/\\\/cropped-realclimate-banner.jpg\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/#articleImage\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512},\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-01T18:01:45-05:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2009-05-01T07:59:17-05:00\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"commentCount\":595,\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/index.php\\\/archives\\\/2009\\\/04\\\/advocacy-vs-science\\\/#webpage\"},\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/index.php\\\/archives\\\/2009\\\/04\\\/advocacy-vs-science\\\/#webpage\"},\"articleSection\":\"Climate Science, English\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/index.php\\\/archives\\\/2009\\\/04\\\/advocacy-vs-science\\\/#breadcrumblist\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org#listItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/index.php\\\/archives\\\/category\\\/climate-science\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Climate Science\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/index.php\\\/archives\\\/category\\\/climate-science\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Climate Science\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/index.php\\\/archives\\\/category\\\/climate-science\\\/\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/index.php\\\/archives\\\/2009\\\/04\\\/advocacy-vs-science\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Advocacy vs. Science\"},\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org#listItem\",\"name\":\"Home\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/index.php\\\/archives\\\/2009\\\/04\\\/advocacy-vs-science\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Advocacy vs. Science\",\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/index.php\\\/archives\\\/category\\\/climate-science\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Climate Science\"}}]},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"RealClimate\",\"description\":\"Climate science from climate scientists...\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/images\\\/\\\/cropped-realclimate-banner.jpg\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/index.php\\\/archives\\\/2009\\\/04\\\/advocacy-vs-science\\\/#organizationLogo\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/index.php\\\/archives\\\/2009\\\/04\\\/advocacy-vs-science\\\/#organizationLogo\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/twitter.com\\\/ClimateOfGavin\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/index.php\\\/archives\\\/author\\\/gavin\\\/#author\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/index.php\\\/archives\\\/author\\\/gavin\\\/\",\"name\":\"Gavin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/index.php\\\/archives\\\/2009\\\/04\\\/advocacy-vs-science\\\/#authorImage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1483483e07a8e720440b094a0bdc955e5e3ed7df78769be8ea6e9b0fef10c26f?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"width\":96,\"height\":96,\"caption\":\"Gavin\"}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/index.php\\\/archives\\\/2009\\\/04\\\/advocacy-vs-science\\\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/index.php\\\/archives\\\/2009\\\/04\\\/advocacy-vs-science\\\/\",\"name\":\"RealClimate: Advocacy vs. Science\",\"description\":\"RealClimate: The advocate will pick up any piece of apparently useful data and without doing any analysis, decide that their pet theory perfectly explains any anomaly without consideration of any alternative explanations. Their conclusion is always that their original theory is correct. The scientist will look at all possibilities and revise their thinking based on a\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/#website\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/index.php\\\/archives\\\/2009\\\/04\\\/advocacy-vs-science\\\/#breadcrumblist\"},\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/index.php\\\/archives\\\/author\\\/gavin\\\/#author\"},\"creator\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/index.php\\\/archives\\\/author\\\/gavin\\\/#author\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-01T18:01:45-05:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2009-05-01T07:59:17-05:00\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/\",\"name\":\"RealClimate\",\"description\":\"Climate science from climate scientists...\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.realclimate.org\\\/#organization\"}}]}\n\t\t<\/script>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"RealClimate: Advocacy vs. Science","description":"RealClimate: The advocate will pick up any piece of apparently useful data and without doing any analysis, decide that their pet theory perfectly explains any anomaly without consideration of any alternative explanations. Their conclusion is always that their original theory is correct. The scientist will look at all possibilities and revise their thinking based on a","canonical_url":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2009\/04\/advocacy-vs-science\/","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"","webmasterTools":{"google-site-verification":"5-5cpEuryTX8bKt_pnL8bRcqfVflejqKS-2UK8aSA3c","miscellaneous":""},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2009\/04\/advocacy-vs-science\/#article","name":"RealClimate: Advocacy vs. Science","headline":"Advocacy vs. Science","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/author\/gavin\/#author"},"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/#organization"},"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/images\/\/cropped-realclimate-banner.jpg","@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/#articleImage","width":512,"height":512},"datePublished":"2009-04-01T18:01:45-05:00","dateModified":"2009-05-01T07:59:17-05:00","inLanguage":"en-US","commentCount":595,"mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2009\/04\/advocacy-vs-science\/#webpage"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2009\/04\/advocacy-vs-science\/#webpage"},"articleSection":"Climate Science, English"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2009\/04\/advocacy-vs-science\/#breadcrumblist","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org#listItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/category\/climate-science\/#listItem","name":"Climate Science"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/category\/climate-science\/#listItem","position":2,"name":"Climate Science","item":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/category\/climate-science\/","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2009\/04\/advocacy-vs-science\/#listItem","name":"Advocacy vs. Science"},"previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org#listItem","name":"Home"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2009\/04\/advocacy-vs-science\/#listItem","position":3,"name":"Advocacy vs. Science","previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/category\/climate-science\/#listItem","name":"Climate Science"}}]},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/#organization","name":"RealClimate","description":"Climate science from climate scientists...","url":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/images\/\/cropped-realclimate-banner.jpg","@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2009\/04\/advocacy-vs-science\/#organizationLogo","width":512,"height":512},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2009\/04\/advocacy-vs-science\/#organizationLogo"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/twitter.com\/ClimateOfGavin"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/author\/gavin\/#author","url":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/author\/gavin\/","name":"Gavin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2009\/04\/advocacy-vs-science\/#authorImage","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1483483e07a8e720440b094a0bdc955e5e3ed7df78769be8ea6e9b0fef10c26f?s=96&d=blank&r=g","width":96,"height":96,"caption":"Gavin"}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2009\/04\/advocacy-vs-science\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2009\/04\/advocacy-vs-science\/","name":"RealClimate: Advocacy vs. Science","description":"RealClimate: The advocate will pick up any piece of apparently useful data and without doing any analysis, decide that their pet theory perfectly explains any anomaly without consideration of any alternative explanations. Their conclusion is always that their original theory is correct. The scientist will look at all possibilities and revise their thinking based on a","inLanguage":"en-US","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/#website"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2009\/04\/advocacy-vs-science\/#breadcrumblist"},"author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/author\/gavin\/#author"},"creator":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/author\/gavin\/#author"},"datePublished":"2009-04-01T18:01:45-05:00","dateModified":"2009-05-01T07:59:17-05:00"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/","name":"RealClimate","description":"Climate science from climate scientists...","inLanguage":"en-US","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/#organization"}}]},"og:locale":"en_US","og:site_name":"RealClimate | Climate science from climate scientists...","og:type":"article","og:title":"RealClimate: Advocacy vs. Science","og:description":"RealClimate: The advocate will pick up any piece of apparently useful data and without doing any analysis, decide that their pet theory perfectly explains any anomaly without consideration of any alternative explanations. Their conclusion is always that their original theory is correct. The scientist will look at all possibilities and revise their thinking based on a","og:url":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2009\/04\/advocacy-vs-science\/","article:published_time":"2009-04-01T23:01:45+00:00","article:modified_time":"2009-05-01T12:59:17+00:00","twitter:card":"summary","twitter:site":"@ClimateOfGavin","twitter:title":"RealClimate: Advocacy vs. Science","twitter:description":"RealClimate: The advocate will pick up any piece of apparently useful data and without doing any analysis, decide that their pet theory perfectly explains any anomaly without consideration of any alternative explanations. Their conclusion is always that their original theory is correct. The scientist will look at all possibilities and revise their thinking based on a","twitter:creator":"@ClimateOfGavin"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"665","title":null,"description":null,"keywords":null,"keyphrases":null,"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"default","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":null,"og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":false,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":null,"schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":null,"robots_max_videopreview":null,"robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":null,"location":null,"local_seo":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"ai":null,"created":"2021-03-31 22:25:59","updated":"2025-06-03 23:50:36","seo_analyzer_scan_date":null},"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/665","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=665"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/665\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=665"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=665"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=665"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}