{"id":9,"date":"2004-11-22T19:02:33","date_gmt":"2004-11-22T23:02:33","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=9"},"modified":"2010-10-06T23:35:40","modified_gmt":"2010-10-07T04:35:40","slug":"pca-details","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2004\/11\/pca-details\/","title":{"rendered":"PCA details"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kcite-section\" kcite-section-id=\"9\">\n<p CLASS=\"western\" STYLE=\"margin-bottom: 0in\"><b>PCA  of  the 70 North American ITRDB Tree-ring Proxy Series used by Mann et al (1998)<\/b><\/p>\n<p CLASS=\"western\" STYLE=\"margin-bottom: 0in\">\n<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p CLASS=\"western\" STYLE=\"margin-bottom: 0in\">a. Eigenvalue spectrum for Mann et al (1998) PCA analysis (1902-1980 zero reference period, data normalized by detrended 1902-1980 standard deviation):<\/p>\n<p CLASS=\"western\" STYLE=\"margin-bottom: 0in\">\n<pre>\r\n                Rank          Explained Variance       Cumulative Variance\r\n                 1                 0.3818 \t  \t 0.3818\r\n                 2                 0.0976 \t\t 0.4795\r\n                 _______________________________________________\r\n                 3                 0.0491 \t\t 0.5286\r\n                 4                 0.0354  \t\t 0.5640\r\n<\/pre>\n<\/p>\n<p CLASS=\"western\" STYLE=\"margin-bottom: 0in\">First 2 PCs were retained based on application of the standard selection rules (see Figure 1) used by Mann et al (1998).<\/p>\n<p CLASS=\"western\" STYLE=\"margin-bottom: 0in\">\n<\/p>\n<p CLASS=\"western\" STYLE=\"margin-bottom: 0in\">b. Eigenvalue spectrum for PCA analysis Based on Convention of MM  (1400-1971 zero reference period, data un-normalized)<\/p>\n<p CLASS=\"western\" STYLE=\"margin-bottom: 0in\">\n<\/p>\n<p CLASS=\"western\" STYLE=\"margin-bottom: 0in\">\n<pre>\r\n                Rank          Explained Variance       Cumulative Variance\r\n                 1                 0.1946\t  \t 0.1946\r\n                 2                 0.0905\t\t 0.2851\r\n                 3                 0.0783\t\t 0.3634\r\n                 4                 0.0663 \t\t 0.4297\r\n                 5                 0.0549  \t\t 0.4846\r\n                 _______________________________________________\r\n                 6                 0.0373  \t\t 0.5219\r\n<\/pre>\n<\/p>\n<p CLASS=\"western\" STYLE=\"margin-bottom: 0in\">First 5 PCs should be retained in this case employing the standard selection rules (see Figure 1) used by Mann et al (1998). <\/p>\n<p CLASS=\"western\" STYLE=\"margin-bottom: 0in\">\n<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"figure\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p LANG=\"\" CLASS=\"western\" STYLE=\"margin-bottom: 0in\"><img SRC=\"\/images\/PCAdetails_html_m1d988d0d.png\" NAME=\"Graphic1\" ALIGN=BOTTOM HSPACE=12 WIDTH=462 HEIGHT=370 BORDER=0\/>\n<\/p>\n<p CLASS=\"western\" STYLE=\"margin-bottom: 0in\"><b>FIGURE 1<\/b>.<br \/>\nComparison of eigenvalue spectrum resulting from a Principal Components Analysis (PCA) of the 70 North American ITRDB data used by Mann et al (1998) back to AD 1400 based on Mann et al (1998) centering\/normalization convention (blue circles) and MM centering\/normalization convention (red crosses). Shown also is the null distribution based on Monte Carlo simulations with 70 independent red noise series of the same length and same lag-one autocorrelation structure as the actual ITRDB data using the respective centering and normalization conventions (blue curve for MBH98 convention, red curve for MM convention). In the former case, 2 (or perhaps 3) eigenvalues are distinct from the noise eigenvalue continuum. In the latter case, 5 (or perhaps 6) eigenvalues are distinct from the noise eigenvalue continuum.<\/p>\n<!-- kcite active, but no citations found -->\n<\/div> <!-- kcite-section 9 -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>PCA of the 70 North American ITRDB Tree-ring Proxy Series used by Mann et al (1998)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-9","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-supplemental-data","7":"entry"},"aioseo_notices":[],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5149,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9\/revisions\/5149"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}