{"id":9931,"date":"2011-11-22T13:55:39","date_gmt":"2011-11-22T18:55:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/?p=9931"},"modified":"2011-11-22T13:55:39","modified_gmt":"2011-11-22T18:55:39","slug":"two-year-old-turkey","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2011\/11\/two-year-old-turkey\/","title":{"rendered":"Two-year old turkey"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

The blogosphere is abuzz with the appearance of a second tranche of the emails<\/a> stolen from CRU just before thanksgiving in 2009. Our original commentary is still available of course (CRU Hack<\/a>, CRU Hack: Context<\/a>, etc<\/a>.), and very little appears to be new in this batch. Indeed, even the out-of-context quotes aren’t that exciting, and are even less so in-context.<\/p>\n

A couple of differences in this go around are worth noting: the hacker was much more careful to cover their tracks in the zip file they produced – all the file dates are artificially set to Jan 1 2011 for instance, and they didn’t bother to hack into the RealClimate server this time either. Hopefully they have left some trails that the police can trace a little more successfully than they’ve been able to thus far from the previous release. <\/p>\n

But the timing of this release is strange. Presumably it is related to the upcoming Durban talks, but it really doesn’t look like there is anything worth derailing there at all. Indeed, this might even increase interest! A second release would have been far more effective a few weeks after the first – before the inquiries and while people still had genuine questions. Now, it just seems a little forced, and perhaps a symptom of the hacker’s frustration that nothing much has come of it all and that the media and conversation has moved on. <\/p>\n

If anyone has any questions about anything they see that seems interesting, let us know in the comments and we’ll see if we can provide some context. We anticipate normal service will be resumed shortly.<\/p>\n\n<\/div> ","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The blogosphere is abuzz with the appearance of a second tranche of the emails stolen from CRU just before thanksgiving in 2009. Our original commentary is still available of course (CRU Hack, CRU Hack: Context, etc.), and very little appears to be new in this batch. Indeed, even the out-of-context quotes aren’t that exciting, and […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1,24,38,34],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9931","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-climate-science","category-reporting-on-climate","category-scientific-practice","category-skeptics","entry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t