• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Climate Science / Unforced Variations: May 2013

Unforced Variations: May 2013

3 May 2013 by group

This month’s open thread.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

Reader Interactions

551 Responses to "Unforced Variations: May 2013"

Comments pagination

« Previous 1 … 10 11 12
  1. Mal Adapted says

    1 Jun 2013 at 9:10 AM

    David Benson:

    Is there some convenient approximate formula for determining what proportion of available moisture precipitates at different altitudes with downwind rising terrain? A rather crude approximation suffices but I’ve never seen one.

    The PRISM group at Oregon State U. developed a model to do that, although you may not find it very convenient. I don’t believe the project suffered much from the involvement of George Taylor.

« Older Comments

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Koonin’s Continuing Calumnies
  • Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • 2025 Updates
  • A peek behind the curtain…

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Secular Animist on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Secular Animist on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Secular Animist on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Ray Ladbury on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Ron R. on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • KirkS on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Dean Myerson on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Tomáš Kalisz on 2025 Updates
  • b fagan on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Radge Havers on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Joseph O'Sullivan on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Radge Havers on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Joseph O'Sullivan on A peek behind the curtain…
  • Tomáš Kalisz on 2025 Updates
  • Tomáš Kalisz on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Michael Brown on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Ron R. on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Ken Towe on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Helmut Syrowatka on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Barton Paul Levenson on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Barton Paul Levenson on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Barton Paul Levenson on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Barton Paul Levenson on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Dan on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Jean-Pierre Demol on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Spencer Weart on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Data on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,398 posts

15 pages

250,251 comments

Copyright © 2026 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.