• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / 2004 / Archives for November 2004

Archives for November 2004

Rutherford et al 2005 highlights

22 Nov 2004 by mike

The claims of McIntyre and McKitrick regarding the Mann et al (1998) temperature reconstruction have recently been discredited by the following peer-reviewed article to appear in the American Meteorological Society journal, “Journal of Climate“:

Rutherford, S., Mann, M.E., Osborn, T.J., Bradley, R.S., Briffa, K.R., Hughes, M.K., Jones, P.D., Proxy-based Northern Hemisphere Surface Temperature Reconstructions: Sensitivity to Methodology, Predictor Network, Target Season and Target Domain, Journal of Climate, in press (2005).

Key excerpts from the article are provided below: [Read more…] about Rutherford et al 2005 highlights

Filed Under: Supplemental data

PCA details

22 Nov 2004 by mike

PCA of the 70 North American ITRDB Tree-ring Proxy Series used by Mann et al (1998)

[Read more…] about PCA details

Filed Under: Supplemental data

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Are direct water vapor emissions endangering anyone?
  • The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • National Climate Assessment links
  • Ocean circulation going South?

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Ron R. on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • patrick o twentyseven on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • Ron R. on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • b fagan on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • David on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Piotr on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Piotr on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • Tomáš Kalisz on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • Ken Towe on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Geoff Miell on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Silvia Leahu-Aluas on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • zebra on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Ken Towe on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • zebra on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Atomsk's Sanakan on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • Rory Allen on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Rory Allen on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Rory Allen on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Silvia Leahu-Aluas on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Rory Allen on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Rory Allen on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,375 posts

11 pages

245,799 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.