• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Extras / Comment Policy / Comment policy

Comment policy

9 Dec 2004 by group

  1. Comments are moderated. Comments are periodically reviewed, but especially at weekends, evenings and holidays, there may be some delay in approving otherwise non-contentious posts. Please be patient.
  2. Questions, clarifications and serious rebuttals and discussions are welcomed.
  3. Only comments that are germane to the post will be approved. Comments that are “off-topic” should be made on an open thread (usually entitled “Unforced Variations”), and we may move OT comments to those threads.
  4. Comments that contain links to inappropriate, irrelevant or commercial sites may be deleted.
  5. Discussion of non-scientific subjects is discouraged.
  6. No flames, profanity, ad hominem comments are allowed. This includes comments that (explicitly or implicitly) impugn the motives of others, or which otherwise try to personalize matters under discussion.
  7. We reserve the right to make spelling corrections, correct text format problems, etc.
  8. We use moderation to improve the “signal to noise” in the discussion. For this reason, we may choose to screen out comments that simply repeat points made in previous comments, make claims that have already been dealt with or that “muddy the water” by introducing erroneous, specious, or otherwise misleading assertions. These comments may be sent to “The Bore Hole“.
  9. We reserve the right to either reject comments that do not meet the above criteria, or in certain cases to edit them in a manner that brings them into accordance with our comments policy (e.g. by simply deleting inflammatory or ad hominem language from an otherwise worthy comment). In cases where we do this, it will be noted by an [edit].
  10. Given that RealClimate represents a volunteer effort by about 10 different contributors, each of whom are free to participate in queue moderation, the items indicated above only constitute the basic ground rules. We cannot insure uniform application of the various considerations listed above from one individual comment to the next.
  11. Quick responses to questions that don’t merit a full post will be placed in-line (with credits).
  12. All comments are assumed to be released into the public domain.
  13. Comments generally close after a month.
  14. Repeat violators of our comments policy (in particular, individuals demonstrating a pattern of “trolling”) may be barred from future access to the blog.

revised 01/06/11

Filed Under: Comment Policy

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • Spencer’s Shenanigans: Part II
  • The Puzzling Pleistocene
  • How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Ken Towe on Spencer’s Shenanigans: Part II
  • Ray Ladbury on Spencer’s Shenanigans: Part II
  • Martin Smith on Spencer’s Shenanigans: Part II
  • Martin Smith on Spencer’s Shenanigans: Part II
  • Ron R. on Spencer’s Shenanigans: Part II
  • Ron R. on The Puzzling Pleistocene
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Spencer’s Shenanigans: Part II
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Spencer’s Shenanigans: Part II
  • Toby Thaler on Spencer’s Shenanigans: Part II
  • Ron R. on The Puzzling Pleistocene
  • Radge Havers on Spencer’s Shenanigans: Part II
  • Martin Smith on Spencer’s Shenanigans: Part II
  • zebra on Spencer’s Shenanigans: Part II
  • Ken Towe on Spencer’s Shenanigans: Part II
  • Karsten V. Johansen on Spencer’s Shenanigans: Part II
  • Dean Rovang on Spencer’s Shenanigans: Part II
  • Rory Allen on Spencer’s Shenanigans: Part II
  • John Pollack on Spencer’s Shenanigans: Part II
  • Ron R. on Spencer’s Shenanigans: Part II
  • Ron R. on The Puzzling Pleistocene
  • Ron R. on The Puzzling Pleistocene
  • Nigelj on Spencer’s Shenanigans: Part II
  • Tomáš Kalisz on The Puzzling Pleistocene
  • MA Rodger on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Nigelj on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on The Puzzling Pleistocene
  • Piotr on The Puzzling Pleistocene
  • Data on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Data on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,402 posts

15 pages

251,036 comments

Copyright © 2026 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.