• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Climate Science / The story of methane in our climate, in five pie charts

The story of methane in our climate, in five pie charts

23 Sep 2014 by david

methane_pie


methane_pie

Filed Under: Climate Science

About david

Reader Interactions

106 Responses to "The story of methane in our climate, in five pie charts"

Comments pagination

« Previous 1 2 3
  1. Will says

    9 Oct 2014 at 12:08 PM

    http://skepticalscience.com/long-hot-tail-eocene.html

    This latest SkS piece is mostly about the Eocene, but it makes mention at the end of the warmer interglacials of the recent past, the ones often looked at when discussing the methane issue. According to this article, while those interglacials were warmer, the deep oceans were only slightly so compared to today’s warming. Is this accounted for in the estimates of methane release from deep-sea hydrates – or, does it even have to be? Does the length of time needed for the heat signal to reach the deposits still argue against any near-term major release?

  2. Geoff Beacon says

    9 Oct 2014 at 4:15 PM

    Mal Adapted @94

    [A decent carbon tax] if imposed soon enough, would render talk of geo-engineering moot, by driving a rapid transition to non-fossil energy sources.

    If a rapid transition were enough that would be fine but some are suggesting we need to be at 350ppm atmosperic CO2 and others even lower (i.e.considerably below current levals).

    The point about a high carbon tax is that it would give future generations more options by cutting carbon emissions and controlling climate by geoengineering. It would do it by unleashing the power of a price driven market. If such a carbon tax were very successful less geoengineering might be needed.

    If the tax were recyled as in Hansen’s carbon fee or similar it would engender a more equal distribution of wealth. It’s worth noting that amongst developed nations more equal societies are happier. (See Richard Wilkinson’s Ted Talk)

    To return to methane: cutting these emissions would also give future generations more options as I argued @77 above.

  3. David B. Benson says

    9 Oct 2014 at 6:30 PM

    And the methane comes from
    http://www.livescience.com/48229-four-corners-methane-hotspot.html
    in the USA.

  4. Mal Adapted says

    10 Oct 2014 at 8:23 AM

    Geoff Beacon:

    The point about a high carbon tax is that it would give future generations more options by cutting carbon emissions and controlling climate by geoengineering. It would do it by unleashing the power of a price driven market. If such a carbon tax were very successful less geoengineering might be needed.

    Yes, I should have made it clear I really don’t disagree with your argument. I support carefully-designed projects to sequester carbon in soils, etc. OTOH, the sooner GHG emissions are reduced to zero, the less traction wild-eyed proposals to inject SO2 into the upper atmosphere, for example, will gain.

  5. larsjaeger says

    10 Oct 2014 at 9:16 AM

    First some basics: methane (CH4) is a very simple molecule (one carbon surrounded by four hydrogen atoms) and is created predominantly by bacteria that feed on organic material. In dry conditions, there is plenty of atmospheric oxygen, and so aerobic bacteria which produce carbon dioxide (CO2) are preferred.

  6. Hank Roberts says

    1 Nov 2014 at 12:29 PM

    I noted this and quoted the abstract in the open thread, but it belongs here:
    ________________
    it’s remarkable how precisely satellite measurement of methane actually at ground level is being detected with these satellite instruments — for example:
    Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 491-506, 2014
    http://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/7/491/2014/
    doi:10.5194/amt-7-491-2014
    © Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

    Retrieval techniques for airborne imaging of methane concentrations using high spatial and moderate spectral resolution: application to AVIRIS

    They’re measuring it downwind of oil storage tanks! And the next generation sensors are even better.
    _____________________

    I understand there’s industry opposition to this kind of spot detection of sources (for any chemical, whether done from the ground or air or satellite).

    But I’d expect we should be seeing more soon that will tell us where the methane is coming from.

« Older Comments

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Time and Tide Gauges wait for no Voortman
  • Lil’ NAS Express
  • DOE CWG Report “Moot”?

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Thomas W Fuller on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Keith Woollard on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Michael on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Michael on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Martin Smith on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Mo Yunus on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Mo Yunus on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Piotr on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Mo Yunus on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Steven Emmerson on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Steven Emmerson on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Ken Towe on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • JCM on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Susan Anderson on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Ron R. on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Ron R. on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Radge Havers on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • zebra on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Radge Havers on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Piotr on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • frankclimate on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Piotr on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • zebra on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Martin Smith on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,384 posts

11 pages

247,777 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.