• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Extras / Comment Policy / Comment policy

Comment policy

9 Dec 2004 by group

  1. Comments are moderated. Comments are periodically reviewed, but especially at weekends, evenings and holidays, there may be some delay in approving otherwise non-contentious posts. Please be patient.
  2. Questions, clarifications and serious rebuttals and discussions are welcomed.
  3. Only comments that are germane to the post will be approved. Comments that are “off-topic” should be made on an open thread (usually entitled “Unforced Variations”), and we may move OT comments to those threads.
  4. Comments that contain links to inappropriate, irrelevant or commercial sites may be deleted.
  5. Discussion of non-scientific subjects is discouraged.
  6. No flames, profanity, ad hominem comments are allowed. This includes comments that (explicitly or implicitly) impugn the motives of others, or which otherwise try to personalize matters under discussion.
  7. We reserve the right to make spelling corrections, correct text format problems, etc.
  8. We use moderation to improve the “signal to noise” in the discussion. For this reason, we may choose to screen out comments that simply repeat points made in previous comments, make claims that have already been dealt with or that “muddy the water” by introducing erroneous, specious, or otherwise misleading assertions. These comments may be sent to “The Bore Hole“.
  9. We reserve the right to either reject comments that do not meet the above criteria, or in certain cases to edit them in a manner that brings them into accordance with our comments policy (e.g. by simply deleting inflammatory or ad hominem language from an otherwise worthy comment). In cases where we do this, it will be noted by an [edit].
  10. Given that RealClimate represents a volunteer effort by about 10 different contributors, each of whom are free to participate in queue moderation, the items indicated above only constitute the basic ground rules. We cannot insure uniform application of the various considerations listed above from one individual comment to the next.
  11. Quick responses to questions that don’t merit a full post will be placed in-line (with credits).
  12. All comments are assumed to be released into the public domain.
  13. Comments generally close after a month.
  14. Repeat violators of our comments policy (in particular, individuals demonstrating a pattern of “trolling”) may be barred from future access to the blog.

revised 01/06/11

Filed Under: Comment Policy

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • Time and Tide Gauges wait for no Voortman
  • Lil’ NAS Express
  • DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Unforced Variations: Sep 2025

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Susan Anderson on Lil’ NAS Express
  • Ray Ladbury on Lil’ NAS Express
  • Ray Ladbury on Lil’ NAS Express
  • Karsten V. Johansen on Lil’ NAS Express
  • Ken Towe on Lil’ NAS Express
  • Ken Towe on Lil’ NAS Express
  • Rory Allen on Lil’ NAS Express
  • MA Rodger on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Barton Paul Levenson on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Lil’ NAS Express
  • Ken Towe on Lil’ NAS Express
  • Nick Palmer on Lil’ NAS Express
  • Dan on Lil’ NAS Express
  • Silvia Leahu-Aluas on Lil’ NAS Express
  • Silvia Leahu-Aluas on Lil’ NAS Express
  • b fagan on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Ted Moffett on Lil’ NAS Express
  • Mo Yunus on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Piotr on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Russell Seitz on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Mal Adapted on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Steven Emmerson on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Piotr on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Steven Emmerson on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Mal Adapted on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • b fagan on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Barton Paul Levenson on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Kevin McKinney on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Kevin McKinney on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,381 posts

11 pages

246,774 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.