• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Climate Science / Unforced Variations: Sep 2011

Unforced Variations: Sep 2011

1 Sep 2011 by group

This month’s open thread…

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

Reader Interactions

352 Responses to "Unforced Variations: Sep 2011"

Comments pagination

« Previous 1 … 6 7 8
  1. J Bowers says

    1 Oct 2011 at 2:57 AM

    Re. 350 Pete Dunkelberg

    And Monckton pipes in with accusations of criminal fraud, encouraging Watts to take his material to the cops. Of course, they could do the actual experiment themselves, it’s not as if Watts didn’t get the equipment required. But he just takes some photos of his version of the setup and declines Monckton’s suggestion. Hmmm, I wonder why. Delingpole accuses fraud now, as well.

  2. J Bowers says

    1 Oct 2011 at 5:41 AM

    Here’s a child doing the CO2 experiment.

    Linda’s first CO2 experiment

    She seems far more scientifically curious and capable than Anthony Watts and Monckton of Brenchley.

« Older Comments

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Koonin’s Continuing Calumnies
  • Unforced variations: Feb 2026

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Atomsk's Sanakan on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Piotr on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Nigelj on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Piotr on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Ron R. on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Ray Ladbury on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Ray Ladbury on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Ray Ladbury on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Pete Best on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Wolfgang on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Martin Smith on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Martin Smith on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Dominik Lenné on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • zebra on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Ron R. on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Ron R. on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Ken Towe on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • JCM on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Barton Paul Levenson on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Pete Best on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Ron R. on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Keith Woollard on How robust is our accelerometer?

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,400 posts

15 pages

250,705 comments

Copyright © 2026 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.