• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Climate Science / Forced Responses: May 2018

Forced Responses: May 2018

4 May 2018 by group

The bimonthly open thread focused on climate solutions, mitigation and adaptation. Please keep this focused.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread, Solutions

Reader Interactions

301 Responses to "Forced Responses: May 2018"

Comments pagination

« Previous 1 … 5 6 7
  1. Al Bundy says

    30 Jun 2018 at 1:37 PM

    Kevin: milestone for renewable energy in the US

    AB: Thanks. But I’ve got to note that it was freaking painfully achieved and way too slow. Plus misleading since electricity ain’t everything. Houses last a long time and retrofitting efficiency is neither easy nor cheap. Gas furnaces, gas stoves, gas water heaters… why are we still building housing without passive solar, without solar hot water, without super-insulated walls? Seriously, sane buildings and hybrid cars are easy and give way better bang for the buck than “cool” stuff like EVs, PV and turbines. Instead of tossing thousands at each EV we should have been tossing a few hundred at each hybrid and requiring that all taxis (including Uber and Lyft) get at least 45 MPG. We should have used feebates to get auto manufacturers (and all other industries) to eat each other’s lunch in a big scrum focused on increased efficiency. (If you have to pay your competitor because their cars get better mileage, well, that’s worse than eating your veggies, eh?) We should have been raising building codes through the roof. We shoulda, coulda, woulda….

    We’re focused on a relatively small slice of the US carbon pie. Assuming my decimals didn’t wander:
    3900,000,000,000 Kwh = 1.4 x 10 to the 19 joules
    2200,000,000 metric tons of oil equiv (total energy use) = 1 x 10 to the 20 joules

    And I fixed your wrong-thread-problem.

« Older Comments

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Are direct water vapor emissions endangering anyone?
  • The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • National Climate Assessment links
  • Ocean circulation going South?

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Ron R. on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • patrick o twentyseven on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • Ron R. on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • b fagan on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • David on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Piotr on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Piotr on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • Tomáš Kalisz on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • Ken Towe on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Geoff Miell on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Silvia Leahu-Aluas on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • zebra on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Ken Towe on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • zebra on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Atomsk's Sanakan on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • Rory Allen on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Rory Allen on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Rory Allen on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Silvia Leahu-Aluas on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Rory Allen on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Rory Allen on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,375 posts

11 pages

245,799 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.