• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Climate Science / Forced Responses: May 2018

Forced Responses: May 2018

4 May 2018 by group

The bimonthly open thread focused on climate solutions, mitigation and adaptation. Please keep this focused.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread, Solutions

Reader Interactions

301 Responses to "Forced Responses: May 2018"

Comments pagination

« Previous 1 … 5 6 7
  1. Al Bundy says

    30 Jun 2018 at 1:37 PM

    Kevin: milestone for renewable energy in the US

    AB: Thanks. But I’ve got to note that it was freaking painfully achieved and way too slow. Plus misleading since electricity ain’t everything. Houses last a long time and retrofitting efficiency is neither easy nor cheap. Gas furnaces, gas stoves, gas water heaters… why are we still building housing without passive solar, without solar hot water, without super-insulated walls? Seriously, sane buildings and hybrid cars are easy and give way better bang for the buck than “cool” stuff like EVs, PV and turbines. Instead of tossing thousands at each EV we should have been tossing a few hundred at each hybrid and requiring that all taxis (including Uber and Lyft) get at least 45 MPG. We should have used feebates to get auto manufacturers (and all other industries) to eat each other’s lunch in a big scrum focused on increased efficiency. (If you have to pay your competitor because their cars get better mileage, well, that’s worse than eating your veggies, eh?) We should have been raising building codes through the roof. We shoulda, coulda, woulda….

    We’re focused on a relatively small slice of the US carbon pie. Assuming my decimals didn’t wander:
    3900,000,000,000 Kwh = 1.4 x 10 to the 19 joules
    2200,000,000 metric tons of oil equiv (total energy use) = 1 x 10 to the 20 joules

    And I fixed your wrong-thread-problem.

« Older Comments

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Time and Tide Gauges wait for no Voortman
  • Lil’ NAS Express
  • DOE CWG Report “Moot”?

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Mo Yunus on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Steven Emmerson on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Nigelj on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Piotr on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • zebra on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Thomas W Fuller on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Keith Woollard on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Michael on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Michael on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Martin Smith on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Mo Yunus on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Mo Yunus on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Piotr on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Mo Yunus on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Steven Emmerson on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Steven Emmerson on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Ken Towe on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • JCM on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Susan Anderson on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Ron R. on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Ron R. on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Radge Havers on Unforced variations: Oct 2025

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,384 posts

11 pages

247,786 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.