• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Climate Science / Climate impacts / The warm beer chart

The warm beer chart

13 Apr 2011 by Gavin

Perhaps a way to connect with Joe Sixpack?

Tagline: If we can pay as much attention to the Earth as we do to our beer, we probably wouldn’t need to worry about global warming.

Design by S. Han, loosely based on IPCC (2007), courtesy of the “Artist as Citizen” initiative. (Full size pdf version)

Filed Under: Climate impacts, Climate Science, IPCC

About Gavin

Reader Interactions

55 Responses to "The warm beer chart"

Comments pagination

« Previous 1 2
  1. kevin mckinney says

    20 Apr 2011 at 9:27 PM

    #50–

    A practical demonstration of Predestination?

  2. Russell says

    21 Apr 2011 at 10:39 AM

    As another Calvinist once remarked,

    Malt does more than Milton can
    To justify God’s ways to man.

  3. Emily says

    28 Apr 2011 at 10:37 PM

    This is awesome! I could this being made into t-shirts and distributing them around campus. Way better than our environmental studies student association club that always makes the same, “I love nature” earth day shirts. I love nature but this is hilarious and will totally get people’s attention and isn’t stereotypical tie dye stuff. Especially college kids who live off PBR but I’m from Kansas City and we drink Boulevard..mm delicious local beer. Y’all be jealous!!

  4. Anoneumouse says

    29 Apr 2011 at 5:12 AM

    Yeh all very interesting but it is not a HEN

  5. CRS, Dr.P.H. says

    1 May 2011 at 10:24 PM

    Folks, please do not stoop to the level of some of the neanderthals who stand in the way of emissions control. The graphic is “cute,” but we don’t need cute….we need to re-visit policy, carefully examine our statements and data presentations, and make DAMN certain that we do not over-reach as in the past (“Snow will be a memory” etc.)

    We are conducting a vast experiment upon the ecosystem, and anyone who thinks carbon dioxide is a benign gas may want to consider why we don’t walk around with dry-cleaners bags over our heads. If you want a poster child, de-emphasize the long-range warming impacts and focus upon the very visible damage that we are doing in coastal ecosystems (see National Geographic’s issue on this: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2011/04/ocean-acidification/kolbert-text)

    Folks won’t be amused when they go to the local Red Lobster restaurant & all that remains on the blackboard are jellyfish!! This will likely happen in 50 years at this rate.

« Older Comments

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Koonin’s Continuing Calumnies
  • Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • 2025 Updates
  • A peek behind the curtain…

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Data on 2025 Updates
  • prl on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Atomsk's Sanakan on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Edmund Esterbauer on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Tim Jones on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Radge Havers on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Nigelj on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on 1.5ºC and all that
  • Ray Ladbury on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Ray Ladbury on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Ron R. on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Martin Smith on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Ron R. on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Ron R. on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Tomáš Kalisz on 2025 Updates
  • Dean Myerson on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Dean Myerson on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Dean Myerson on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • b fagan on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Karsten V. Johansen on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Pete Best on Unforced variations: Feb 2026

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,398 posts

15 pages

250,228 comments

Copyright © 2026 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.