• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Climate Science / Arctic and Antarctic / The Arctic Climate Impact Assessment II

The Arctic Climate Impact Assessment II

5 Dec 2004 by Gavin

Another apparent ‘refutation’ appears in a CNS news story (a right-wing internet news service). The piece is predominantly an interview with Pat Michaels and other less prominent skeptics. We take their scientific points one at a time:

Michaels refuted McCain’s assertions about the North Pole, noting that the Arctic has actually been warmer in the past than it is now.

“It was warmer 4 to 7,000 years ago [in the Arctic.] Every climatologist knows that. I saw no mention of that in the Arctic report that was paraded in front of McCain,” Michaels said. He added that the past warming of the Arctic couldn’t possibly be blamed on greenhouse gas emissions since it occurred long before the industrial era.

This is a non-sequitur. The Arctic was warmer in the past but as a function of the change in the Earth’s orbit, something that isn’t relevant for explaining the current warming. 6000 years ago, changes in the Earth’s tilt and precession meant that the increase in high latitude solar radiation was around 5 W/m2 in the annual mean, and up to five times as much in the summer. This annual change is close to that projected for 2xCO2 later this century.

Next, Sallie Baliunas:

“Antarctica has been cooling for the last 50 years. Most of the Arctic has not warmed over long time scales,” Baliunas told CNSNews.com. Baliunas also serves as the enviro-science editor for Tech Central Station.

“Temperatures [have] always changed in the past and [they] always will. It can either go up or it goes down. We don’t have enough understanding of natural variability and we don’t see enormous amounts of temperature change to be alarmed about,” Baliunas explained.

The first point was addressed in a previous post, and the second statement probably refers to the mid-Holocene and so the previous comment on Michaels is relevant. The degree of natural variability is of course key in attributing climate change to anthropogenic changes, and all estimates of this based on proxy records in the past and modelling studies point to the recent warming as being outside the range of natural variability. Change is indeed a constant, but it is the magnitude and rate of change in the current situation that is unusual.

And finally, a new definition of the word ‘refute’:

McCain’s claims about a robin population explosion in the Arctic were refuted as well.

Marlo Lewis, a senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), said “Even if it’s true that robins are making their first appearance in Arctic areas, what it means it that the robin’s habitat is expanding.”

“I always thought environmentalists liked birds. To me this is good news,” Lewis added.

Apparently ‘refute’ now means ‘to agree in every respect’….

Filed Under: Arctic and Antarctic, Climate Science

About Gavin

Reader Interactions

1 Responses to "The Arctic Climate Impact Assessment II"

  1. Ziel says

    15 Dec 2004 at 1:57 AM

    Do you think that McCain’s comment about robins in the Arctic being
    a sure sign of global warming is worthy of refutation on this site?

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • Unforced variations: Jun 2025
  • Predicted Arctic sea ice trends over time
  • The most recent climate status
  • Unforced variations: May 2025
  • Unforced Variations: Apr 2025
  • WMO: Update on 2023/4 Anomalies

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Jun 2025
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced variations: Jun 2025
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced variations: Jun 2025
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Predicted Arctic sea ice trends over time
  • Pete Best on Unforced variations: Jun 2025
  • Piotr on Predicted Arctic sea ice trends over time
  • Adam Lea on Unforced variations: Jun 2025
  • Adam Lea on Unforced variations: Jun 2025
  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Jun 2025
  • Radge Havers on Unforced variations: Jun 2025
  • Piotr on The most recent climate status
  • Piotr on Predicted Arctic sea ice trends over time
  • Piotr on Predicted Arctic sea ice trends over time
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced variations: Jun 2025
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced variations: Jun 2025
  • The Prieto Principle on Predicted Arctic sea ice trends over time
  • MA Rodger on Unforced variations: Jun 2025
  • Mr. Know It All on Unforced variations: Jun 2025
  • Silvia Leahu-Aluas on Unforced variations: Jun 2025
  • The Prieto Principle on Unforced variations: Jun 2025

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,367 posts

11 pages

243,616 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.