• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Home
  • Start here
  • Contributors
  • Archives
You are here: Home / Climate Science / New look

New look

19 Jan 2006 by group

Hopefully readers will appreciate the new look we have given the site (you may need to reload for it to work properly). We have added some new features attached to the buttons above – an index which may prove useful in navigating the site, a more prominent Search function (which searches posts and comments), a link to the archives etc. This has allowed us to reduce some of the clutter and hopefully make this site a little more user friendly. If there are any problems, wrinkles that need to be ironed out, or if you have suggestions for further improvement, let us know at contrib -at- realclimate -dot- org.

Filed Under: Climate Science

Reader Interactions

12 Responses to "New look"

  1. Sam says

    19 Jan 2006 at 3:50 PM

    Good job.
    A section of books reviewed here might be a good idea. Spracking of which, Lovelock’s new book seems to demand a critcal review by other climatologists. Any such planned here?

  2. pqs says

    19 Jan 2006 at 3:52 PM

    oups! There is not enough space for the “Archive” button. It isn’t in his place. I’m using Mozilla Firefox 1.5 on Ubuntu (Breezy) with a screen resolution of 1024×768 px.

    [Response:Hmm. I made the buttons a bit smaller but it might be a css issue…I will investigate. – gavin]

  3. Steven T. Corneliussen says

    19 Jan 2006 at 4:29 PM

    In my opinion your “New Look” looks great. The growing RC site is now easier to use. Thanks very much for these improvements.

  4. John Atkeison says

    19 Jan 2006 at 5:47 PM

    Thanks folks!
    (If I were to quibble, I would say that the graphic at the top could lose about .375 of an inch off the bottom… )
    :-)

  5. Coby says

    19 Jan 2006 at 8:35 PM

    Looks good! I really appreciate the index, (having all the titles listed on one page is a great convenience) and the easier to get at search box.

    I would also like to see a complete listing of posts in chronological order, (ascending or descending, probably most recent on top makes sense) maybe a link to such on the “Archives” page…?

    Graphic and top menu is very nice, but it does take up too much vertical real estate.

  6. Persa says

    19 Jan 2006 at 9:21 PM

    I like the picture. You can really see those anvil tops.

  7. Pat Neuman says

    19 Jan 2006 at 11:45 PM

    Awhile back at RC, I said I wanted to share my recent Alaska climate station temperature plots with others at RC, but that I’d need advise in where to put them. I didn’t see a reply at RC. I’ve been loading them into my ClimateArchiveDiscussion(CAD) yahoo group, which now includes the temperature plots at Alaska and other stations in the Midwest, and hydrologic traces at river stations. To view the plots (as photos), people would need to join the group. Only members of CAD can access the Photos directory. I think a few people may have joined CAD from RC in order to view my temperature plots. It seems like there should be a place for people to put their plots for discussion at RC.
    People can join by going to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ClimateArchiveDiscussion/

  8. Nils Harder says

    20 Jan 2006 at 7:24 AM

    Hmm… I think I’ll need some days to get used to this new design. What are those black cubes behind the “RealClimate”? And the website is only filling half my screen. I’m using Firefox 1.5 with a 1280×1024 resolution.

  9. pqs says

    20 Jan 2006 at 2:51 PM

    Now it is all right.

    >>oups! There is not enough space for the “Archive” button. It isn’t in his place. I’m using Mozilla Firefox 1.5 on Ubuntu (Breezy) with a screen resolution of 1024×768 px.

    >[Response:Hmm. I made the buttons a bit smaller but it might be a css issue…I will investigate. – gavin]

  10. JS says

    20 Jan 2006 at 5:48 PM

    Could those dark shapes be nuclear cooling towers?

    Emitting water vapour?

    [Response: They are cooling towers, and so that is water vapour, but they could be from any kind of power station – coal for instance. But it was a stock image, so I’m not sure of the provenance. – gavin]

  11. __earth says

    21 Jan 2006 at 12:13 AM

    hey hey hey! Is this a kind of happy new year kind of new look? =)

  12. tapasananda says

    5 Feb 2006 at 9:28 PM

    Please put me [back]on your subscribers list . This is my second request. You need all believers– even ones with funny names. Tapasananda

Primary Sidebar

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • 2022 updates to model-observation comparisons
  • Unforced variations: Feb 2023
  • 2022 updates to the temperature records
  • Unforced variations: Jan 2023
  • The water south of Greenland has been cooling, so what causes that?
  • Unforced variations: Dec 2022

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Don Williams on Unforced variations: Feb 2023
  • Mr. Know It All on Unforced variations: Feb 2023
  • Mr. Know It All on Unforced variations: Feb 2023
  • Ray Ladbury on 2022 updates to the temperature records
  • Don Williams on 2022 updates to the temperature records
  • Steven Emmerson on 2022 updates to model-observation comparisons
  • Carbomontanus on The water south of Greenland has been cooling, so what causes that?
  • zebra on Unforced variations: Feb 2023
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced variations: Feb 2023
  • Barton Paul Levenson on 2022 updates to the temperature records
  • Carbomontanus on Unforced variations: Feb 2023
  • Carbomontanus on 2022 updates to model-observation comparisons

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA

  • Data Sources
  • Climate model projections compared to observations

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index

Realclimate Stats

1,292 posts

8 pages

229,592 comments

Copyright © 2023 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.