• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Climate Science / This new El Niño is different

This new El Niño is different

8 Jul 2026 by rasmus 4 Comments

Screen dump from https://pulse.climate.copernicus.eu
Screen dump from Copernicus C3S climate pulse showing the status on sea surface temperature (SST) on July 6, 2026. The curve on the left shows the global mean SST -record-high – and the right hand panel presents SST anomailes in the Pacific where the classical El Nino signature is readily seen. Source: https://pulse.climate.copernicus.eu

There is a new El Niño out there and it was officially declared already on June 11 by NOAA. This is both unusually early in the year and very soon since the last El Niño in 2023-24. Another remarkable thing is the seasonal forecasts, which for a couple of months have indicated that it may well be at strengths by the end of the year that we have not seen before. All these three aspects combined seem to make this El Niño different to the previous ones.

Screen dump of ECMWF seasonal forecast
Screen dump from ECMWF seasonal forecast for the NINO3.4 index. Source: https://charts.ecmwf.int/products/seasonal_system5_nino_plumes?base_time=202607010000&nino_area=NINO3-4

One question is whether such El Niño events, which is a phase of the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phenomenon, is changing because of global warming.

ENSO is a natural phenomenon, but so is also the greenhouse effect. We know that exploitation of fossil resources releases greenhouse gases, such as CO2 and methane, which strengthen the greenhouse effect. This is well-established knowledge.

The first time I was confronted with the question whether global warming also may affect ENSO was back in the 1990s, when I did my D.Phil. on mechanisms responsible for ENSO dynamics.

It was also the time seasonal forecasting was established at the European Centre for Medium Range Forecasting (ECMWF), and it was very much focused on ENSO. Since then, the seasonal forecasts for ENSO have made impressive progress and are now quite accurate (see the graphic above).

One indicator central for ENSO is NINO3.4 which provides a measure of how much the average sea surface temperature (SST) over the region 5°S-5°N/120°W-170°W deviates from normal conditions. The latest seasonal forecasts for NINO3.4 are shown in the graphics above.

Jacob Bjerknes was a pioneer on ENSO and the first to realise that El Niño events were coupled with changes in the atmosphere, the Southern Oscillation. Since ENSO indeed involves a coupling between the ocean and the atmosphere, there are several ways that global warming plausibly may affect how ENSO behaves.

The mechanisms that drive the ENSO dynamics include cloud formation, how winds respond to temperature changes, and how Rossby and Kelvin waves propagate in the ocean. In my D.Phil thesis from 1997, I found that the propagation Kelvin waves is affected by changes in the temperature structure. There have been many studies since then, and different global climate model studies (GCMs) have pointed in different directions.

One problem is that the GCMs may not have had detailed descriptions of small-scale parts of the system with sufficiency accuracy to give a robust result, and a quote from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, assessment report 6 by working group 1 (IPCC AR6 WG1) sums it up:

CMIP6 models are able to reproduce most aspects of the spatial structure and variance of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and Indian Ocean Basin and Dipole modes of variability (medium confidence). However, despite a slight improvement in CMIP6, some underlying processes are still poorly represented.

In this case, CMIP6 refers to the World Climate Research Programme’s (WCRP) Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6. While the IPCC AR6 WG1 concludes that

There is no consensus from models for a systematic change in amplitude of ENSO sea surface temperature (SST) variability over the 21st century in any of the SSP scenarios assessed,

I still think that this question is not resolved, since there are also studies suggesting that the models indicate that a global warming may result in stronger El Nino events, e.g. Cai et al., (2014) and Fredriksen et al., (2020).

References

  1. W. Cai, S. Borlace, M. Lengaigne, P. van Rensch, M. Collins, G. Vecchi, A. Timmermann, A. Santoso, M.J. McPhaden, L. Wu, M.H. England, G. Wang, E. Guilyardi, and F. Jin, "Increasing frequency of extreme El Niño events due to greenhouse warming", Nature Climate Change, vol. 4, pp. 111-116, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2100
  2. H. Fredriksen, J. Berner, A.C. Subramanian, and A. Capotondi, "How Does El Niño–Southern Oscillation Change Under Global Warming—A First Look at CMIP6", Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 47, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090640

Filed Under: Climate Science, El Nino, Featured Story

About rasmus

D. Phil in physics from Atmospheric, Oceanic & Planetary Physics, Oxford University, U.K.
Funding: governmental (Norwegian Science Foundation)

Reader Interactions

4 Responses to "This new El Niño is different"

  1. Edward Burke says

    8 Jul 2026 at 8:25 AM

    Here’s the link to the 6 July NOAA CPC update (the ENSO Diagnostic Discussion update is scheduled to post Thursday, 9 July–the link is in the PDF document):

    https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/lanina/enso_evolution-status-fcsts-web.pdf

    Already, data suggest that El Nino conditions may persist “into” March, though later assessments may well show that conditions persist “through” March, if not into April or beyond.

    Reply
  2. Joseph O'Sullivan says

    8 Jul 2026 at 9:58 AM

    Thank you for this. I read that this El Nino was different. I was not sure exactly why, but at the summary at the top of the post, unusually short time since the last, an earlier start in the year, and predicted to be stronger than ever, answered that for me.
    “I still think that this question is not resolved, since there are also studies suggesting that the models indicate that a global warming may result in stronger El Nino events” I also wondered about how global warming could change or currently is changing El Nino, but sometimes the most interesting answer is we don’t know yet.

    Reply
  3. Michael Coday says

    8 Jul 2026 at 5:09 PM

    thank you, Rasmus, for spelling out what is going on.
    Mike

    Reply
  4. EarthClimate says

    9 Jul 2026 at 1:46 AM

    March 2026

    Models are converging on prediction of an El Nino beginning this year, peaking in early 2027. After overlooking the possibility of an El Nino this year, some reporting is jumping on a “Super El Nino” bandwagon. El Nino strength and frequency are important, especially the issue of whether these are modified by global warming. However, the more important knowledge that needs to be extracted from near-term global warming concerns interpretation of ongoing, extraordinary, acceleration of ocean surface warming. Impacts of this ocean warming include a factor of two greater warming over land, increased extreme precipitation, and poleward movement of subtropical conditions.
    The fundamental advance in the past five years in understanding of global climate change is realization that equilibrium climate sensitivity is substantially larger than the long-standing best estimate of 3°C for doubled CO2. The underestimate was due to an implicit assumption that aerosol climate forcing changed negligibly during the period of rapid linear warming that began about 1970 and on heavy dependence of climate sensitivity assessments on observed warming of the past century. Multiple data sources now indicate that climate sensitivity is 4-5°C, which is consistent with aerosol-cloud modeling that reveals increasing aerosol cooling during the 1970-2005 period of rapid linear warming because of increased global spread of the aerosol sources. This explains why underlying climate sensitivity must be larger to account for the observed temperature rise. High climate sensitivity and reduction of East Asia and ship aerosol sources in the past 10-15 years combine to drive accelerated sea surface temperature warming. The first author appeals to his longtime friend Bill McKibben to help communicate the current knowledge because of the implications for the wellbeing of today’s young people and their children.
    We are developing a website that will be continually updated with the aim of aiding understanding of long-term climate change. We also are now on Substack.

    https://jimehansen.substack.com/p/super-el-nino-super-warming-is-the

    June 2026 Yes, 2026 is on Track to be the Hottest Year https://jimehansen.substack.com/p/yes-2026-is-on-track-to-be-the-hottest
    Video https://dai.ly/xah8dwu

    Reply

Comment Policy:Please note that if your comment repeats a point you have already made, or is abusive, or is the nth comment you have posted in a very short amount of time, please reflect on the whether you are using your time online to maximum efficiency. Thanks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • This new El Niño is different
  • Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • Unforced Variations: June 2026
  • “The Arctic Council is not dead”
  • Scenarios, schmenarios…
  • Unforced Variations: May 2026

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • MA Rodger on Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • EarthClimate on This new El Niño is different
  • Martin Smith on Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • Michael Coday on This new El Niño is different
  • John Pollack on Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • Piotr on Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • Ray Ladbury on Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • Martin Smith on Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • Joseph O'Sullivan on This new El Niño is different
  • zebra on Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • Joseph O'Sullivan on Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • Edward Burke on This new El Niño is different
  • Martin Smith on Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • MA Rodger on Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • Kobayashi Maru on Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • Piotr on Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • Kobayashi Maru on Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • Kobayashi Maru on Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • Kobayashi Maru on Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • JCM on Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • JCM on Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • zebra on Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • zebra on Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced Variations: July 2026
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced Variations: July 2026

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

0 posts

15 pages

251,958 comments

Copyright © 2026 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.