• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Climate Science / New public opinion poll on global warming

New public opinion poll on global warming

23 Aug 2006 by Gavin

There is a new Zogby poll on public attitudes in the US towards global warming and the potential connection between severe weather events and climate change.

Unsurprisingly to us (but maybe not to others), most of the US public feel that global warming is happening (around 70%), and roughly the same amount of people report being more or much more convinced of this over the last two years.

More interestingly, the pollsters asked whether people believed that global warming was having an effect on intense hurricanes, droughts, heat waves and the like. Again, roughly 70% of people thought that global warming was having either some effect or a major effect on these weather extremes (note that the question was not phrased to ask whether any specific event was thought likely to have been caused by global warming (which was probably a good choice)).

This begs the question whether people’s experience of severe weather has convinced them that climate change is occuring. Televangelist Pat Robertson, for instance, said very recently that it was the latest heat wave that finally convinced him. I think this is likely to be true for most of the public who are not following the issue very carefully (which is most of them of course!). The most significant single event in this context was probably Katrina, regardless of how much climate change can or can’t be associated with Katrina the Hurricane (let alone Katrina the Disaster!).

I would guess that this is likely to be a very common way for public opinion to be formed across a whole number of issues. That is, when a dominant theme is very prevalent across a wide spectra of media, everyday occurrences or new information are often processed with that in mind, and given our extraordinary ability to see patterns in noisy data, we often end up associating the theme with our own experiences. Other examples surely abound in medical or political contexts.

Given that pattern, it is probably overly optimistic to expect scientists, who continually stress that single weather events can’t in general be attributed to climate change but that changes in statistics might be, to have much success in conveying these finer points to the public directly. Instead, their skills are probably best used in clarifying these points to those (e.g. journalists, policy-makers) that set the dominant themes in the first place.

Filed Under: Climate Science, RC Forum, Reporting on climate

About Gavin

Reader Interactions

102 Responses to "New public opinion poll on global warming"

Comments pagination

« Previous 1 2 3
  1. Pat Neuman says

    6 Sep 2006 at 8:52 PM

    Gavin wrote … This begs the question whether people’s experience of severe weather has convinced them that climate change is occurring.

    It doesn’t matter if people are convinced that climate change is occurring or if people think that climate change has a major effect on weather extremes – unless they are willing to try to change what they do about it.

    You may want to check out my new link.

  2. Stephen Berg says

    14 Sep 2006 at 2:38 AM

    http://www.harpers.org/bb-arctic-refuge-fallacies-928347.html

« Older Comments

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • Site updates etc.
  • Raising Climate Literacy
  • Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Nigelj on Raising Climate Literacy
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Atomsk's Sanakan on Raising Climate Literacy
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Yebo Kando on Raising Climate Literacy
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Atomsk's Sanakan on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Atomsk's Sanakan on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Wpml etal on Site updates etc.
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Susan Anderson on Raising Climate Literacy
  • Ray Ladbury on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Wpml etal on Site updates etc.
  • Piotr on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • David on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • David on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Atomsk's Sanakan on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • David on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • David on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • David on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Geoff Miell on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Wpml etal on Site updates etc.
  • Wpml etal on Site updates etc.
  • Mr. Know It All on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Atomsk's Sanakan on Raising Climate Literacy

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,387 posts

15 pages

248,651 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.