• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Climate Science / New public opinion poll on global warming

New public opinion poll on global warming

23 Aug 2006 by Gavin

There is a new Zogby poll on public attitudes in the US towards global warming and the potential connection between severe weather events and climate change.

Unsurprisingly to us (but maybe not to others), most of the US public feel that global warming is happening (around 70%), and roughly the same amount of people report being more or much more convinced of this over the last two years.

More interestingly, the pollsters asked whether people believed that global warming was having an effect on intense hurricanes, droughts, heat waves and the like. Again, roughly 70% of people thought that global warming was having either some effect or a major effect on these weather extremes (note that the question was not phrased to ask whether any specific event was thought likely to have been caused by global warming (which was probably a good choice)).

This begs the question whether people’s experience of severe weather has convinced them that climate change is occuring. Televangelist Pat Robertson, for instance, said very recently that it was the latest heat wave that finally convinced him. I think this is likely to be true for most of the public who are not following the issue very carefully (which is most of them of course!). The most significant single event in this context was probably Katrina, regardless of how much climate change can or can’t be associated with Katrina the Hurricane (let alone Katrina the Disaster!).

I would guess that this is likely to be a very common way for public opinion to be formed across a whole number of issues. That is, when a dominant theme is very prevalent across a wide spectra of media, everyday occurrences or new information are often processed with that in mind, and given our extraordinary ability to see patterns in noisy data, we often end up associating the theme with our own experiences. Other examples surely abound in medical or political contexts.

Given that pattern, it is probably overly optimistic to expect scientists, who continually stress that single weather events can’t in general be attributed to climate change but that changes in statistics might be, to have much success in conveying these finer points to the public directly. Instead, their skills are probably best used in clarifying these points to those (e.g. journalists, policy-makers) that set the dominant themes in the first place.

Filed Under: Climate Science, RC Forum, Reporting on climate

About Gavin

Reader Interactions

102 Responses to "New public opinion poll on global warming"

Comments pagination

« Previous 1 2 3
  1. Pat Neuman says

    6 Sep 2006 at 8:52 PM

    Gavin wrote … This begs the question whether people’s experience of severe weather has convinced them that climate change is occurring.

    It doesn’t matter if people are convinced that climate change is occurring or if people think that climate change has a major effect on weather extremes – unless they are willing to try to change what they do about it.

    You may want to check out my new link.

  2. Stephen Berg says

    14 Sep 2006 at 2:38 AM

    http://www.harpers.org/bb-arctic-refuge-fallacies-928347.html

« Older Comments

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • The Puzzling Pleistocene
  • How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Koonin’s Continuing Calumnies

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Nigelj on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Karsten V. Johansen on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • patrick o twentyseven on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Karsten V. Johansen on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • zebra on The Puzzling Pleistocene
  • jgnfld on The Puzzling Pleistocene
  • MA Rodger on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Tomáš Kalisz on The Puzzling Pleistocene
  • John Pollack on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Ray Ladbury on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Ron R. on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Edward Burke on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • zebra on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • MA Rodger on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Martin Smith on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Nigelj on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Radge Havers on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Dave_Geologist on The Puzzling Pleistocene
  • Dave_Geologist on The Puzzling Pleistocene
  • Pete Best on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Mr. Know It All on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Nigelj on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Piotr on The Puzzling Pleistocene
  • Piotr on The Puzzling Pleistocene
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Piotr on The Puzzling Pleistocene

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,401 posts

15 pages

250,977 comments

Copyright © 2026 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.