• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Climate Science / New public opinion poll on global warming

New public opinion poll on global warming

23 Aug 2006 by Gavin

There is a new Zogby poll on public attitudes in the US towards global warming and the potential connection between severe weather events and climate change.

Unsurprisingly to us (but maybe not to others), most of the US public feel that global warming is happening (around 70%), and roughly the same amount of people report being more or much more convinced of this over the last two years.

More interestingly, the pollsters asked whether people believed that global warming was having an effect on intense hurricanes, droughts, heat waves and the like. Again, roughly 70% of people thought that global warming was having either some effect or a major effect on these weather extremes (note that the question was not phrased to ask whether any specific event was thought likely to have been caused by global warming (which was probably a good choice)).

This begs the question whether people’s experience of severe weather has convinced them that climate change is occuring. Televangelist Pat Robertson, for instance, said very recently that it was the latest heat wave that finally convinced him. I think this is likely to be true for most of the public who are not following the issue very carefully (which is most of them of course!). The most significant single event in this context was probably Katrina, regardless of how much climate change can or can’t be associated with Katrina the Hurricane (let alone Katrina the Disaster!).

I would guess that this is likely to be a very common way for public opinion to be formed across a whole number of issues. That is, when a dominant theme is very prevalent across a wide spectra of media, everyday occurrences or new information are often processed with that in mind, and given our extraordinary ability to see patterns in noisy data, we often end up associating the theme with our own experiences. Other examples surely abound in medical or political contexts.

Given that pattern, it is probably overly optimistic to expect scientists, who continually stress that single weather events can’t in general be attributed to climate change but that changes in statistics might be, to have much success in conveying these finer points to the public directly. Instead, their skills are probably best used in clarifying these points to those (e.g. journalists, policy-makers) that set the dominant themes in the first place.

Filed Under: Climate Science, RC Forum, Reporting on climate

About Gavin

Reader Interactions

102 Responses to "New public opinion poll on global warming"

Comments pagination

« Previous 1 2 3
  1. Pat Neuman says

    6 Sep 2006 at 8:52 PM

    Gavin wrote … This begs the question whether people’s experience of severe weather has convinced them that climate change is occurring.

    It doesn’t matter if people are convinced that climate change is occurring or if people think that climate change has a major effect on weather extremes – unless they are willing to try to change what they do about it.

    You may want to check out my new link.

  2. Stephen Berg says

    14 Sep 2006 at 2:38 AM

    http://www.harpers.org/bb-arctic-refuge-fallacies-928347.html

« Older Comments

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • Unforced Variations: June 2026
  • “The Arctic Council is not dead”
  • Scenarios, schmenarios…
  • Unforced Variations: May 2026
  • Unforced Variations: Apr 2026
  • A reflection on reflection

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • pgeo on “The Arctic Council is not dead”
  • b fagan on “The Arctic Council is not dead”
  • MA Rodger on “The Arctic Council is not dead”
  • Dave on “The Arctic Council is not dead”
  • Ron R. on Unforced Variations: May 2026
  • zebra on “The Arctic Council is not dead”
  • JCM on Scenarios, schmenarios…
  • Ray Ladbury on “The Arctic Council is not dead”
  • Robert Gibson on “The Arctic Council is not dead”
  • MA Rodger on Scenarios, schmenarios…
  • Ray Ladbury on A reflection on reflection
  • Martin Smith on Scenarios, schmenarios…
  • Yebo Kando on Scenarios, schmenarios…
  • Karsten V. Johansen on “The Arctic Council is not dead”
  • jgnfld on A reflection on reflection
  • J Robert Gibson on “The Arctic Council is not dead”
  • Robert Cutler on A reflection on reflection
  • Marcus C Sarofim on “The Arctic Council is not dead”
  • Gary Herstein on “The Arctic Council is not dead”
  • jgnfld on Scenarios, schmenarios…
  • Martin Smith on “The Arctic Council is not dead”
  • Martin Smith on Scenarios, schmenarios…
  • Joke Zonderkop on Scenarios, schmenarios…
  • Joke Zonderkop on Scenarios, schmenarios…
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on A reflection on reflection
  • MA Rodger on A reflection on reflection
  • jgnfld on Scenarios, schmenarios…
  • MA Rodger on Unforced Variations: May 2026
  • Roger Bryenton on Scenarios, schmenarios…
  • Thomas Fuller on Scenarios, schmenarios…

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,408 posts

15 pages

251,663 comments

Copyright © 2026 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.