• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Climate Science / Unforced variations: Jan 2020

Unforced variations: Jan 2020

1 Jan 2020 by group

The new open thread on climate science for a new year, and a new decade – perhaps the Soaring Twenties? What precisely will be soaring is yet to be decided though.

Two things will almost certainly go up – CO2 emissions and temperatures:

As 2019 wraps up, what can we look forward to in 2020?

More of the same, plus a little bit more… pic.twitter.com/nmMP6riIjZ

— Gavin Schmidt (@ClimateOfGavin) December 22, 2019

But maybe also ambition, determination, and changes that will lead to reduced emissions in future? Fingers crossed.

Filed Under: Climate Science, RC Forum

Reader Interactions

503 Responses to "Unforced variations: Jan 2020"

Comments pagination

« Previous 1 … 9 10 11
  1. Al Bundy says

    4 Feb 2020 at 10:13 PM

    mrkia: Round trip Germany to the North Pole on an airliner. A 3 year old comment said the cost was 2,000 Euros. Very

    AB: human to get joy out of looking at that which looking at is destroying. Shrodingeristic fo sure

  2. Al Bundy says

    4 Feb 2020 at 10:31 PM

    I’m really amazed at how conservatives like mrkia crow about how liberals are smart enough to solve the problems conservatives bring so we should embrace conservative beliefs.

    Yeah, really. Dig into mrkia’s mind and the above is exactly the core, even though he’s totally in denial of his Attempted Truth. Without Liberals Conservatives die in place.

  3. Killian says

    5 Feb 2020 at 8:26 AM

    Re #490 Al Bundy
    The prize was established in 1968 by a donation from Sweden’s central bank Sveriges Riksbank to the Nobel Foundation to commemorate the bank’s 300th anniversary.[3][7][8][9] As it is not one of the prizes that Alfred Nobel established in his will in 1895, it is not technically a Nobel Prize.

    It’s not a Nobel Prize. It is not awarded by the Nobel committee.

    However, it is administered and referred to along with the Nobel Prizes by the Nobel Foundation. Laureates are announced with the Nobel Prize laureates, and receive the award at the same ceremony.

    The money was donated to the Nobel Foundation to establish the prize, so they “administer” the prize.

    So totally not associated is quite incorrect. My bad. But it’s not a Nobel, it’s not awarded by the Nobel people, and… there’s a reason for that. (This is the germane point in all this.)

« Older Comments

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Koonin’s Continuing Calumnies
  • Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • 2025 Updates
  • A peek behind the curtain…

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Tomáš Kalisz on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • patrick o twentyseven on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Secular Animist on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Ron R. on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Ron R. on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Ray Ladbury on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Nigelj on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Tomáš Kalisz on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Susan Anderson on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Patrick McDaniel on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Ron R. on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Susan Anderson on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Susan Anderson on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Susan Anderson on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Ken Towe on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Ken Towe on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Ken Towe on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Barton Paul Levenson on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Barton Paul Levenson on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Barton Paul Levenson on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Joseph O'Sullivan on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Atomsk's Sanakan on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • jgnfld on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Tomáš Kalisz on 2025 Updates
  • Tomáš Kalisz on 2025 Updates
  • Data on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,398 posts

15 pages

250,348 comments

Copyright © 2026 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.