• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Open thread / Forced responses: Nov 2021

Forced responses: Nov 2021

3 Nov 2021 by Gavin

A bi-monthly open thread related to climate solutions. This month will start off with COP-26 and many targets and plans and mechanisms will be proposed and discussed. Look out for the updated impacts of the evolving NDCs such as this one from Climate Resource, suggesting that the world could be on track for just a little less than 2ºC warming (relative to the pre-industrial) (if everyone does what they pledge and we are lucky with respect to climate sensitivity). Please be respectful and constructive.

Filed Under: Open thread, Solutions

About Gavin

Reader Interactions

775 Responses to "Forced responses: Nov 2021"

Comments pagination

« Previous 1 … 4 5 6
  1. Richard the Weaver says

    1 Jan 2022 at 12:28 AM

    I can’t get to RealClimate directly anymore. If I search for “RealClimate.org” I don’t get any results. I have to search for “RealCli”. That brings up results that include a link to RC’s front page.

    Anyone else is having this problem?

    A half hour till midnight.

  2. Richard the Weaver says

    1 Jan 2022 at 2:23 AM

    Thanks for the leeway.

    Back to your regularly scheduled program…

  3. Richard the Weaver says

    1 Jan 2022 at 10:17 AM

    Nigel,
    You asked about lithium reserves vs fossil fuel reserves.
    If a battery lasts twenty years and half of our lithium reserves will be used in the initial build, and we maintain an 80% lithium recovery during recycling, we get…

    40 years via mining
    32 years via first recycling
    25 years
    20.
    16
    12
    —
    About 144 years. I think there’s enough fossil fuel laying around to match lithium’ s unsustainability. (Hat tip to Killian)

    And since biofuels and synfuels can do the longer-term storage thing,

    wouldn’t it be prudent to stretch out the lithium thing?

    RePete is doing well. When it warms up (two days) I’ll post another Craigslist and I’ll put up a notice in the neighborhood convenience store.

« Older Comments

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Are direct water vapor emissions endangering anyone?

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • nigelj on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • b fagan on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Karsten V. Johansen on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Adam Lea on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • patrick o twentyseven on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Karsten V. Johansen on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • MA Rodger on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • MA Rodger on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Piotr on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • MA Rodger on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Ray Ladbury on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Piotr on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Yebo Kando on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • John Pollack on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • BJ Chippindale on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • BJ Chippindale on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • CherylJosie on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • CherylJosie on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • CherylJosie on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • BJ Chippindale on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • David on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • jgnfld on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • nigelj on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Susan Anderson on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Susan Anderson on Climate Scientists response to DOE report

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,378 posts

11 pages

246,492 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.