• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Climate Science / Unforced Variations: Dec 2021

Unforced Variations: Dec 2021

1 Dec 2021 by group

This month’s open thread on climate science topics.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

Reader Interactions

230 Responses to "Unforced Variations: Dec 2021"

Comments pagination

« Previous 1 2
  1. XRRC says

    31 Dec 2021 at 4:52 AM

    for clarity, the last section [ …… of course there are …..] is a general commentary by myself, it is not a quote like the rest from the video by Mark Zelinka.

  2. XRRC says

    31 Dec 2021 at 7:34 AM

    Dec 29
    When smashing a temperature record it’s normally by a fraction of a degree – not 20 degrees but that is what happened in #Kodiak #Alaska. The temperature hit 19.4C and was so high it broke the record not just for December but for Oct, Nov, Dec, Jan, Feb and March!

    DEC 31
    Very windy, hot, fiery and disastrous in Colorado #ClimateCrisisOnSteroids

  3. XRRC says

    31 Dec 2021 at 7:59 AM

    Andrew Dessler
    If you want to see a scientist who’s profoundly upset about the implications of his work, watch this 50-sec. clip from Michael Dettinger’s Tyndall lecture at @theAGU meeting.
    https://twitter.com/AndrewDessler/status/1476317288257273858

    “We’ve known this for 30-40 years,” speaking of water shortages & climate impacts on the western US, “and not only scientists but all of society, we need to start taking this stuff a lot more seriously.”

    I was in the room for the talk and I have to say I was completely blown away by this. Scientists spend a lot of time looking at numbers & plots that represent true catastrophe for humanity. It begins to get to you after a while. How many wake-up calls do we need before we stop hitting the snooze button?

« Older Comments

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Time and Tide Gauges wait for no Voortman
  • Lil’ NAS Express
  • DOE CWG Report “Moot”?

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Steven Emmerson on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Steven Emmerson on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Ken Towe on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • JCM on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Susan Anderson on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Ron R. on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Ron R. on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Radge Havers on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • zebra on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Radge Havers on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Piotr on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • frankclimate on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Piotr on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • zebra on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Martin Smith on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Keith Woollard on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • David on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • David on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Piotr on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Piotr on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Piotr on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Piotr on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Jaime Palter on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,384 posts

11 pages

247,775 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.