• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Archives for Open thread

Open thread

Unforced variations: Feb 2011

2 Feb 2011 by group

This month’s open thread…

… continued here.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

Unforced variations: Jan 2011

6 Jan 2011 by group

After perusing the comments and suggestions made last week, we are going to try a new approach to dealing with comment thread disruptions. We are going to try and ensure that there is always an open thread for off-topic questions and discussions. They will be called (as this one) “Unforced Variation: [current month]” and we will try and move all off-topic comments on other threads to these threads. So if your comment seems to disappear from one thread, look for it here.

Additionally, we will institute a thread for all the troll-like comments to be called “The Bore Hole” (apologies to any actual borehole specialists) that won’t allow discussion, but will serve to show how silly and repetitive some of the nonsense that we have been moderating out is. (Note that truly offensive posts will still get deleted). If you think you’ve ended up there by mistake, please let us know.

With no further ado, please talk about anything climate science related you like.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Comment Policy, Open thread

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 19
  • Page 20
  • Page 21

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Unforced Variations: Aug 2025

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Radge Havers on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Barton Paul Levenson on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Barton Paul Levenson on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Barton Paul Levenson on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Pete Best on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Adam Lea on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Tojo on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • David on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Susan Anderson on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Susan Anderson on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Susan Anderson on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Susan Anderson on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Susan Anderson on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Susan Anderson on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • David on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Barton Paul Levenson on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • nigelj on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Piotr on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • David on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • David on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • David on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Mal Adapted on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Piotr on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Dale Jones on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • zebra on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • alan on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Ray Ladbury on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,379 posts

11 pages

246,707 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.