• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / 2009 / Archives for November 2009

Archives for November 2009

Is Pine Island Glacier the Weak Underbelly of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet?

9 Nov 2009 by eric

Guest post by Mauri Pelto

AntarcMapPeltoIt is popularly understood that glaciologists consider West Antarctica the biggest source of uncertainty in sea level projections. The base of the 3000-m thick West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) – unlike the much larger East Antarctic Ice Sheet – lies below sea level, and it has been recognized for a long time that this means it has the potential to change very rapidly. Most of the grounded West Antarctic ice sheet drains into the floating Ross and Ronne-Filchner ice shelves, but a significant fraction also drains into the much smaller Pine Island Glacier. Glaciologists are paying very close attention to Pine Island Glacier (“PIG” on map, right) and nearby Thwaites Glacier. In the following guest post, Mauri Pelto explains why.
[Read more…] about Is Pine Island Glacier the Weak Underbelly of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet?

Filed Under: Arctic and Antarctic, Climate Science

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Are direct water vapor emissions endangering anyone?
  • The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • National Climate Assessment links
  • Ocean circulation going South?

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • jgnfld on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • jgnfld on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Thomas Fuller on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Pedro Prieto on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Pedro Prieto on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Pedro Prieto on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Martin Smith on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Nigelj on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Yebo Kando on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • patrick o twentyseven on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • Geoff Miell on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Geoff Miell on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • patrick o twentyseven on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • nigelj on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • MA Rodger on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Russ Doty on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • b fagan on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Adam Lea on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Adam Lea on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • nigelj on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • jgnfld on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Ray Ladbury on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Ron R. on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • patrick o twentyseven on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • Ron R. on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • b fagan on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • David on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Piotr on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,375 posts

11 pages

245,829 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.