June already? Cripes…
Usual rules apply.
Climate science from climate scientists...
by group
by group
by group
by group
by group
This month’s open thread.
Just so you know, a lot of people have complained that these threads have devolved – particularly when the discussion has turned to differing visions of solutions – and have therefore become much less interesting. Some suggestions last month were for a side thread for that kind of stuff that wouldn’t clog interesting issues of climate science. Other suggestions were for tighter moderation. The third suggestion is that people really just stay within the parameters of what this site has to offer: knowledgeable people on climate science issues and context for the science that’s being discussed elsewhere. For the time being, let’s try the last one, combined with some moderation. The goal is not to censor, but rather to maintain somewhere where the science issues don’t get drowned out by the noise.
by group
Happy New Year, and happy new open thread.
As per usual, nuclear energy is off-topic – it’s not that it’s uninteresting, but it ends up dominating conversation to the total exclusion of everything else and just becomes repetitive and dull. Recent excursions on this topic shows what happens when we relax the moderation, so back to being strict about this. If you want to discuss this, please go somewhere else.
by group
by group
Apparently there is a climate conference of some sort going on. Happy to answer any science questions as they arise…
by group
by group
This month’s open thread. Since most climate related discussion this month will be focussed on the COP21…
What is (or should be) the role of climate science in the upcoming negotiations? Discuss.
1,367 posts
11 pages
243,610 comments