• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / 2005 / Archives for November 2005

Archives for November 2005

Lawson vs. the IPCC

9 Nov 2005 by Gavin

Nigel Lawson, one of Britain’s Chancellors of the Exchequer during the Thatcher Era (Secretary of the Treasury for those needing a US translation) and more recently known as the father of Nigella Lawson (a UK cooking diva), has weighed into the climate debate with a recent broadside calling for the abolition of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Based on a curious report by the UK House of Lords Economics Affairs committee (in which they made clear that they had no scientific expertise), Lawson demands that the only global scientific assessment process on climate change be shut down, and replaced with ….well what exactly? [Read more…] about Lawson vs. the IPCC

Filed Under: Climate Science, IPCC

Chaos and Climate

4 Nov 2005 by group

By James Annan and William Connolley

In this post, we will try to explain a little about chaos theory, and its relevance to our attempts to understand and forecast the climate system. The chaotic nature of atmospheric solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations for fluid flow has great impact on weather forecasting (which we discuss first), but the evidence suggests that it has much less importance for climate prediction.

[Read more…] about Chaos and Climate

Filed Under: Climate modelling, Climate Science

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Koonin’s Continuing Calumnies
  • Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • 2025 Updates
  • A peek behind the curtain…

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Chris Korda on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Silvia Leahu-Aluas on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Piotr on 2025 Updates
  • Susan Anderson on 2025 Updates
  • Nigelj on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Ron R. on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Ron R. on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Atomsk's Sanakan on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Tomáš Kalisz on 2025 Updates
  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • zebra on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Karsten V. Johansen on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • JCM on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Chris Korda on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Radge Havers on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Piotr on 2025 Updates
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Ron R. on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Ron R. on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Ron R. on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Mark D. on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Tomáš Kalisz on 2025 Updates
  • Piotr on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,398 posts

15 pages

250,524 comments

Copyright © 2026 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.