• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Archives for group

group

Unforced Variations: Jan 2018

1 Jan 2018 by group

Happy new year, and a happy new open thread.

In response to some the comments we’ve been getting about previous open threads, we are going to try separating out OT comments on mitigation/saving the planet/theories of political action from ones related to the physical climate system. This thread remains a place for climate science issues, questions, & news, but we have started a new Forced Responses thread where people can more clearly discuss mitigation issues. We realise that sometimes it can be hard to cleanly separate these conversations, but hopefully folk can try that out as a new year’s resolution!

Note we will be updating the Model/Data comparisons over the next few weeks as the various observational data sets get updated for calendar year 2017. The main surface temperature datasets will be released around Jan 18.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

Fall AGU 2017

7 Dec 2017 by group

It’s that time of year again. #AGU17 is from Dec 11 to Dec 16 in New Orleans (the traditional venue in San Francisco is undergoing renovations).

As in previous years, there will be extensive live streams from “AGU On Demand” (free, but an online registration is required) of interesting sessions and the keynote lectures from prize-winners and awardees.

Some potential highlights will be Dan Rather, Baba Brinkman, and Joanna Morgan. The E-lightning sessions are already filled with posters covering many aspects of AGU science. Clara Deser, Bjorn Stevens, David Neelin, Linda Mearns and Thomas Stocker are giving some the key climate-related named lectures. The Tyndall Lecture by Jim Fleming might also be of interest.

As usual there are plenty of sessions devoted to public affairs and science communication, including one focused on the use of humour in #scicomm (on Friday at 4pm to encourage people to stay to the end I imagine), and a workshop on Tuesday (joint with the ACLU and CSLDF) on legal issues for scientist activists and advocates.

AGU is also a great place to apply for jobs, get free legal advice, mingle, and network.

A couple of us will be there – and we might find time to post on anything interesting we see. If any readers spot us, say hi!

Filed Under: Climate conference report, Climate Science, Communicating Climate, Scientific practice

Unforced Variations: Dec 2017

3 Dec 2017 by group

Last open-thread of the year. Tips for new books for people to read over the holidays? Highlights of Fall AGU (Dec 11-15, New Orleans)? Requests for what should be in the end of year updates? Try to be nice.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

Unforced variations: Nov 2017

4 Nov 2017 by group

This month’s open thread. Lawsuits about scientific disputes, the new Climate Science Special Report from the National Climate Assessment, and (imminently) the WMO State of the Climate statement for 2017.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

O Say Can You CO2…

12 Oct 2017 by group

Guest Commentary by Scott Denning

The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO-2) was launched in 2014 to make fine-scale measurements of the total column concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere. As luck would have it, the initial couple of years of data from OCO-2 documented a period with the fastest rate of CO2 increase ever measured, more than 3 ppm per year (Jacobson et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2017) during a huge El Niño event that also saw global temperatures spike to record levels.

As part of a series of OCO-2 papers being published this week, a new Science paper by Junjie Liu and colleagues used NASA’s comprehensive Carbon Monitoring System to analyze millions of measurements from OCO-2 and other satellites to map the impact of the 2015-16 El Niño on sources and sinks of CO2, providing insight into the mechanisms controlling carbon-climate feedback.

[Read more…] about O Say Can You CO2…

References

  1. J. Wang, N. Zeng, M. Wang, F. Jiang, H. Wang, and Z. Jiang, "Contrasting terrestrial carbon cycle responses to the two strongest El Niño events: 1997–98 and 2015–16 El Niños", 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/esd-2017-46
  2. J. Liu, K.W. Bowman, D.S. Schimel, N.C. Parazoo, Z. Jiang, M. Lee, A.A. Bloom, D. Wunch, C. Frankenberg, Y. Sun, C.W. O’Dell, K.R. Gurney, D. Menemenlis, M. Gierach, D. Crisp, and A. Eldering, "Contrasting carbon cycle responses of the tropical continents to the 2015–2016 El Niño", Science, vol. 358, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5690

Filed Under: Carbon cycle, Climate modelling, Climate Science, El Nino

1.5ºC: Geophysically impossible or not?

4 Oct 2017 by group

Guest commentary by Ben Sanderson

Millar et al’s recent paper in Nature Geoscience has provoked a lot of lively discussion, with the authors of the original paper releasing a statement to clarify that their paper did not suggest that “action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is no longer urgent“, rather that 1.5ºC (above the pre-industrial) is not “geophysically impossible”.

The range of post-2014 allowable emissions for a 66% chance of not passing 1.5ºC in Millar et al of 200-240GtC implies that the planet would exceed the threshold after 2030 at current emissions levels, compared with the AR5 analysis which would imply most likely exceedance before 2020. Assuming the Millar numbers are correct changes 1.5ºC from fantasy to merely very difficult.

But is this statement overconfident? Last week’s post on Realclimate raised a couple of issues which imply that both the choice of observational dataset and the chosen pre-industrial baseline period can influence the conclusion of how much warming the Earth has experienced to date. Here, I consider three aspects of the analysis – and assess how they influence the conclusions of the study.
[Read more…] about 1.5ºC: Geophysically impossible or not?

Filed Under: Carbon cycle, Climate modelling, Climate Science, Instrumental Record, IPCC

Unforced variations: Oct 2017

1 Oct 2017 by group

This month’s open thread. Carbon budgets, Arctic sea ice minimum, methane emissions, hurricanes, volcanic impacts on climate… Please try and stick to these or similar topics.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

Unforced Variations: Sep 2017

1 Sep 2017 by group

This month’s open thread…. and let’s stay on climate topics this month. It’s not like there isn’t anything climate-y to talk about (sea ice minimums, extreme events, climate model tunings, past ‘hyperthermals’… etc.). Anything too far off-topic will get binned. Thanks!

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

Sensible Questions on Climate Sensitivity

15 Aug 2017 by group

Guest Commentary by Cristian Proistosescu, Peter Huybers and Kyle Armour

tl;dr 

Two recent papers help bridge a seeming gap between estimates of climate sensitivity from models and from observations of the global energy budget. Recognizing that equilibrium climate sensitivity cannot be directly observed because Earth’s energy balance is a long way from equilibrium, the studies instead focus on what can be inferred about climate sensitivity from historical trends. Calculating a climate sensitivity from the simulations that is directly comparable with that observed shows both are consistent. Crucial questions remain, however, regarding how climate sensitivity will evolve in the future.

[Read more…] about Sensible Questions on Climate Sensitivity

Filed Under: Climate modelling, Climate Science, Instrumental Record

Unforced Variations: August 2017

2 Aug 2017 by group

This month’s open thread.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 13
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • Page 16
  • Page 17
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 54
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Are direct water vapor emissions endangering anyone?
  • The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • National Climate Assessment links
  • Ocean circulation going South?

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Steven Emmerson on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • John Pollack on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • John Pollack on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • patrick o twentyseven on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • Ray Ladbury on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • zebra on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Ray Ladbury on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Thomas Fuller on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Thomas on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Thomas on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • Mr. Know It All on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Thomas on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Geoff Miell on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Keith Woollard on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • nigelj on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Thomas on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Kevin McKinney on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Thomas on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Kevin McKinney on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Thomas on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Kevin McKinney on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Kevin McKinney on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Kevin McKinney on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Thomas on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Kevin McKinney on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • nigelj on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • nigelj on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Scott Nudds on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • John Pollack on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,375 posts

11 pages

246,155 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.