• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Archives for group

group

Don’t make a choice that your children will regret

4 Nov 2016 by group

Dear US voters,

the world is holding its breath. The stakes are high in the upcoming US elections. At stake is a million times more than which email server one candidate used, or how another treated women. The future of humanity will be profoundly affected by your choice, for many generations to come.

The coming four years is the last term during which a US government still has the chance, jointly with the rest of the world, to do what is needed to stop global warming well below 2°C and closer to 1.5°C, as was unanimously decided by 195 nations in the Paris Agreement last December. The total amount of carbon dioxide the world can still emit in order to have at least a 50% chance to stop warming at 1.5 °C will, at the current rate of emissions, be all used up in under ten years! This time can only be stretched out by making emissions fall rapidly.

Even 2°C of global warming is very likely to spell the end of most coral reefs on Earth. 2°C would mean a largely ice-free Arctic ocean in summer, right up to the North Pole. Even 2°C of warming is likely to destabilize continental ice sheets and commit the world to many meters of sea-level rise, lasting for millennia. Further global warming will likely lead to increasing extreme weather, droughts, harvest failures, and the risk of armed conflict and mass migration.

greenland00037small

Meltwater on the Greenland Ice Sheet. Photo with kind permission by Ragnar Axelsson.

In case you have any doubts about the science: in the scientific community there is a long-standing consensus that humans are causing dangerous global warming, reflected in the clear statements of many scientific academies and societies from around the world. None of the 195 governments that signed the Paris Agreement saw any reasons for doubting the underlying scientific facts; doubts about the science that you see in some media are largely manufactured by interest groups trying to fool you.

You have a fateful choice to make. The policies of candidates and parties on climate change could hardly be more different. Hillary Clinton would continue to work with the international community to tackle the global warming crisis and help the transition to modern clean and renewable energies. Donald Trump denies that the problem even exists and has promised to go back to coal and to undo the Paris Agreement, which comes into force today, the 4th of November 2016, as culmination of over twenty years of negotiations.

Please consider this carefully. This is not an election about personalities, it is about policies that will determine our future for a long time to come. While the presidential race has gotten the most attention, voters should consider climate not just at the ‘top of the ticket’, but all the way down the ballot. Don’t make a choice that you, your children and your children’s children will regret forever.

David Archer, Rasmus Benestad, Ray Bradley, Michael Mann, Ray Pierrehumbert, Stefan Rahmstorf and Eric Steig

Filed Under: Climate Science, Communicating Climate

Unforced Variations: Oct 2016

1 Oct 2016 by group

Here’s hoping for no October climate surprises…

Carry on. Usual rules.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

Unforced variations: Sep 2016

1 Sep 2016 by group

To come this month: Arctic sea ice minimum, decisions from the IPCC scoping meeting on a report focused on the 1.5ºC target, interesting paleo-climate science at #ICP12 and a chance to stop arguing about politics perhaps.

Usual rules apply.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

Unforced variations: Aug 2016

1 Aug 2016 by group

Sorry for the low rate of posts this summer. Lots of offline life going on. ;-)

Meantime, this paper by Hourdin et al on climate model tuning is very interesting and harks back to the FAQ we did on climate models a few years ago (Part I, Part II). Maybe it’s worth doing an update?

Some of you might also have seen some of the discussion of record temperatures in the first half of 2016. The model-observation comparison including the estimates for 2016 are below:




It seems like the hiatus hiatus will continue…

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

Unforced variations: July 2016

1 Jul 2016 by group

A week is a long time in politics climate science: Nonsense debunked in WaPo, begininngs of recovery in the ozone hole, revisiting the instrumental record constraints on climate sensitivity…

Lots of lessons there.

Usual rules apply.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

Unforced Variations: June 2016

1 Jun 2016 by group

June already? Cripes…

Usual rules apply.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

Unforced variations: May 2016

4 May 2016 by group

This month’s open thread. Usual rules apply.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

Unforced Variations: Apr 2016

2 Apr 2016 by group

This month’s open thread. Standard rules apply…

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

Unforced Variations: Mar 2016

1 Mar 2016 by group

This month’s open thread. Pros and cons of celebrity awareness-raising on climate? The end of the cherry-picking of ‘pauses’ in the satellite data? Continuing impacts of El Niño? Your choice (except for the usual subjects to be avoided…).

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

Unforced Variations: Feb 2016

1 Feb 2016 by group

This month’s open thread.

Just so you know, a lot of people have complained that these threads have devolved – particularly when the discussion has turned to differing visions of solutions – and have therefore become much less interesting. Some suggestions last month were for a side thread for that kind of stuff that wouldn’t clog interesting issues of climate science. Other suggestions were for tighter moderation. The third suggestion is that people really just stay within the parameters of what this site has to offer: knowledgeable people on climate science issues and context for the science that’s being discussed elsewhere. For the time being, let’s try the last one, combined with some moderation. The goal is not to censor, but rather to maintain somewhere where the science issues don’t get drowned out by the noise.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 17
  • Page 18
  • Page 19
  • Page 20
  • Page 21
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 55
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • Unforced Variations: Apr 2026
  • A reflection on reflection
  • Spencer’s Shenanigans: Part II
  • The Puzzling Pleistocene
  • How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Unforced Variations: Mar 2026

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • MA Rodger on Unforced Variations: Apr 2026
  • Tomáš Kalisz on A reflection on reflection
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Unforced Variations: Apr 2026
  • Barton Paul Levenson on A reflection on reflection
  • jgnfld on A reflection on reflection
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced Variations: Apr 2026
  • Ray Ladbury on A reflection on reflection
  • Robert Cutler on A reflection on reflection
  • jgnfld on A reflection on reflection
  • Piotr on Unforced Variations: Apr 2026
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on A reflection on reflection
  • zebra on A reflection on reflection
  • Barton Paul Levenson on A reflection on reflection
  • Barton Paul Levenson on A reflection on reflection
  • Tomáš Kalisz on A reflection on reflection
  • MA Rodger on Unforced Variations: Apr 2026
  • Keith Woollard on A reflection on reflection
  • Tomáš Kalisz on A reflection on reflection
  • Ron R. on Unforced Variations: Apr 2026
  • Matt Skaggs on A reflection on reflection
  • Barton Paul Levenson on A reflection on reflection
  • Randolph M. Fritz on Unforced Variations: Apr 2026
  • Randolph M. Fritz on Unforced Variations: Apr 2026
  • Pete best on Unforced Variations: Apr 2026
  • MA Rodger on A reflection on reflection
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced Variations: Apr 2026
  • Robert Cutler on A reflection on reflection
  • Robert Cutler on A reflection on reflection
  • Robert Cutler on A reflection on reflection
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced Variations: Apr 2026

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,404 posts

15 pages

251,226 comments

Copyright © 2026 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.