• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / 2019 / Archives for November 2019

Archives for November 2019

10 years on

17 Nov 2019 by Gavin

I woke up on Tuesday, 17 Nov 2009 completely unaware of what was about to unfold. I tried to log in to RealClimate, but for some reason my login did not work. Neither did the admin login. I logged in to the back-end via ssh, only to be inexplicably logged out again. I did it again. No dice. I then called the hosting company and told them to take us offline until I could see what was going on. When I did get control back from the hacker (and hacker it was), there was a large uploaded file on our server, and a draft post ready to go announcing the theft of the CRU emails. And so it began.

From “One year later”, 2010.

Many people are weighing in on the 10 year anniversary of ‘Climategate’ – the Observer, a documentary on BBC4 (where I was interviewed), Mike at Newsweek – but I’ve struggled to think of something actually interesting to say.

It’s hard because even in ten years almost everything and yet nothing has changed. The social media landscape has changed beyond recognition but yet the fever swamps of dueling blogs and comment threads has just been replaced by troll farms and noise-generating disinformation machines on Facebook and Twitter. The nominally serious ‘issues’ touched on by the email theft – how robust are estimates of global temperature over the instrumental period, what does the proxy record show etc. – have all been settled in favor of the mainstream by scientists plodding along in normal science mode, incrementally improving the analyses, and yet they are still the most repeated denier talking points.

[Read more…] about 10 years on

Filed Under: Climate Science, Instrumental Record, Paleoclimate, Scientific practice

Sensitive But Unclassified

6 Nov 2019 by Gavin

The US federal government goes to quite a lot of effort to (mostly successfully) keep sensitive but unclassified (SBU) information (like personal data) out of the hands of people who would abuse it. But when it comes to the latest climate models, quite a few are SBU as well.

[Read more…] about Sensitive But Unclassified

Filed Under: Climate modelling, Climate Science, Communicating Climate, Instrumental Record, IPCC

Unforced variations: Nov 2019

1 Nov 2019 by group

This month’s open thread.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • Lil’ NAS Express
  • DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Mal Adapted on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Steven Emmerson on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Piotr on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Steven Emmerson on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Mal Adapted on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • b fagan on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Barton Paul Levenson on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Kevin McKinney on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Kevin McKinney on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • David on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Kevin McKinney on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • David on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Russell Seitz on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Mo Yunus on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Mo Yunus on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Russell Seitz on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • David on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Ray Ladbury on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Susan Anderson on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • b fagan on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • patrick o twentyseven on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Atomsk's Sanakan on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • nigelj on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Mal Adapted on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Piotr on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • MA Rodger on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,379 posts

11 pages

246,750 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.