• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / 2022 / Archives for April 2022

Archives for April 2022

Digital Twinge

28 Apr 2022 by Gavin

A couple of weeks ago the EU announced that they were funding a project called DestinE (Destination Earth) to build ‘digital twins’ of the Earth System to support policy making and rapid reaction to weather and climate events.

While the term ‘digitial twin’ has a long history in the engineering world, it’s only recently been applied to Earth System Modeling, and is intended (I surmise, as does Bryan Lawrence) to denote something more than the modeling of either weather or climate that we’ve been doing for years. But what exactly? And is it an achievable goal or just a rebranding effort of things that are happening anyway?

[Read more…] about Digital Twinge

Filed Under: Climate impacts, Climate modelling, Climate Science, climate services, Featured Story, Instrumental Record Tagged With: cloud computing, DestinE, digital twin

The modern demarcation problem

19 Apr 2022 by Gavin

Defining (and enforcing) a clear line between information and mis-information is impossible, but that doesn’t mean misinformation doesn’t exist or that there is nothing to be done to combat it.

I found myself caught in an ‘interesting’ set of exchanges on twitter a few weeks ago (I won’t link to it to spare you the tedium, but you could probably find it if you look hard enough). The nominal issue was whether deplatforming known bull******s was useful at stemming the spread of misinformation (specifically with respect to discussions around COVID). There is evidence that this does in fact work to some extent, but the twitter thread quickly turned to the question of who decides what is misinformation in the first place, and then descended into a free-for-all where just the very mention that misinformation existed or that the scientific method provided a ratchet to detect it, was met with knee-jerk references to the Nazi’s and the inquisition. So far, so usual, right?

While the specific thread was not particularly edifying, and I’ll grant that my tweets were not perfectly pitched for the specific audience, this is a very modern example of the classic Demarcation Problem (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) in the philosophy of science.

[Read more…] about The modern demarcation problem

Filed Under: Climate Science, Communicating Climate, Featured Story, Scientific practice Tagged With: misinformation

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Koonin’s Continuing Calumnies
  • Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • 2025 Updates
  • A peek behind the curtain…

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Barton Paul Levenson on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Susan Anderson on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Radge Havers on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Ron R. on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Radge Havers on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • b fagan on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Tomáš Kalisz on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • patrick o twentyseven on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Nigelj on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Nigelj on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Ray Ladbury on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Ray Ladbury on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Ray Ladbury on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Joseph O'Sullivan on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Piotr on 2025 Updates
  • Richard Creager on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Atomsk's Sanakan on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Susan Anderson on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Thomas Fuller on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Barton Paul Levenson on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Barton Paul Levenson on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Martin Smith on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,398 posts

15 pages

250,426 comments

Copyright © 2026 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.