• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Climate Science / Climate impacts / DOE CWG Report “Moot”

DOE CWG Report “Moot”

10 Sep 2025 by Gavin Leave a Comment

Somewhat breaking news. A court filing (from 9/4) from DOE has noted that the Climate Working Group has been disbanded (as of 9/3). This was done to make the EDF/UCS lawsuit moot, but it also means that DOE is withdrawing the report, no-one will respond appropriately to the comments submitted, and (possibly) it becomes irrelevant for the EPA reconsideration of the Endangerment Finding.

What a farce.

Filed Under: Climate impacts, Climate modelling, Climate Science, Featured Story, Instrumental Record, IPCC, Model-Obs Comparisons, Scientific practice

About Gavin

Reader Interactions

Comment Policy:Please note that if your comment repeats a point you have already made, or is abusive, or is the nth comment you have posted in a very short amount of time, please reflect on the whether you are using your time online to maximum efficiency. Thanks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • DOE CWG Report “Moot”
  • Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Unforced Variations: Aug 2025

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Kevin McKinney on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Kevin McKinney on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Kevin McKinney on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • b fagan on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • CherylJosie on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Steve B on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Kevin McKinney on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Kevin McKinney on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Kevin McKinney on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Kevin McKinney on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • jgnfld on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • zebra on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • CherylJosie on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Mr. Know It All on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Michael Ghirelli on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Thomas Fuller on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Thomas Fuller on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • b fagan on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Piotr on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Piotr on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Piotr on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Kevin McKinney on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Kevin McKinney on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Steven Emmerson on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • patrick o twentyseven on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Tomáš Kalisz on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,378 posts

11 pages

246,510 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.