• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Archives for Climate Science

Climate Science

Michael Crichton’s State of Confusion II: Return of the Science

15 Dec 2004 by mike

Our first post on Crichton’s new novel “State of Fear” hits most of the key points, though there are a few more errors in the book that we hope to expand upon in future posts.

But for those of you uninterested in buying and reading the book, you can actually find a similar-minded opinion piece by Crichton criticizing climate science (and everything from SETI and the “Drake Equation” to Carl Sagan in the process) here in the public domain.

[Read more…] about Michael Crichton’s State of Confusion II: Return of the Science

Filed Under: Climate modelling, Climate Science, Greenhouse gases, Instrumental Record

Michael Crichton’s State of Confusion L’état de confusion de Michael Crichton

13 Dec 2004 by Gavin

In a departure from normal practice on this site, this post is a commentary on a piece of out-and-out fiction (unlike most of the other posts which deal with a more subtle kind). Michael Crichton’s new novel “State of Fear” is about a self-important NGO hyping the science of the global warming to further the ends of evil eco-terrorists. The inevitable conclusion of the book is that global warming is a non-problem. A lesson for our times maybe? Unfortunately, I think not.

par Gavin Schmidt (traduit par Alain Henry)

Ce message s’écarte des pratiques habituelles de ce site pour commenter une pièce de pure fiction (au contraire des autres messages qui abordent le sujet sous un angle plus subtil). Le nouveau roman de Michael Crichton, « Etat d’urgence » raconte comment une ONG encourage la recherche scientifique sur le réchauffement global pour servir les objectifs de méchants éco-terroristes. Le roman nous amène inévitablement à la conclusion que le réchauffement global est un faux problème. Une leçon pour notre époque? Malheureusement, je ne le pense pas.
(suite….)


[Read more…] about Michael Crichton’s State of Confusion L’état de confusion de Michael Crichton

Filed Under: Arctic and Antarctic, Climate modelling, Climate Science, Greenhouse gases, Instrumental Record, Reviews

Climate Change Disinformation

11 Dec 2004 by mike

by Michael Mann and Gavin Schmidt
As highlighted in the introduction to the site, we seek to clarify the findings of scientists who study the earth’s climate, and have an informed view on the science of climate change. Additionally we will speak out where we feel that the public discourse surrounding the science is being detrimentally impacted by the shrill voices and disinformation campaigns of the “partisan think-tanks or other interested parties”.

[Read more…] about Climate Change Disinformation

Filed Under: Climate Science

Welcome to RealClimate Bienvenue à RealClimate

9 Dec 2004 by group

Climate science is one of those fields where anyone, regardless of their lack of expertise or understanding, feels qualified to comment on new papers and ongoing controversies. This can be frustrating for scientists like ourselves who see agenda-driven ‘commentary’ on the Internet and in the opinion columns of newspapers crowding out careful analysis.
Les sciences du climat forment une discipline dans laquelle qui que ce soit, indépendamment de son expertise ou de sa compréhension, se sent qualifiée pour présenter ses observations sur de nouveaux articles et polémiques en cours. Ceci peut se révéler frustrant pour les scientifiques, comme nous-mêmes, qui lisont des ‘commentaires’ sur le web dictés par des préjugés politiques qui ne tiennent compte de la rigueur des observations scientifiques.

(suite…)
[Read more…] about Welcome to RealClimate Bienvenue à RealClimate

Filed Under: Climate Science

Weren’t temperatures warmer than today during the “Medieval Warm Period”? Ne faisait-il pas plus chaud au Moyen-Age, pendant “l’Optimum climatique”, que maintenant?

8 Dec 2004 by mike

This is one of a number of popular myths regarding temperature variations in past centuries. At hemispheric or global scales, surface temperatures are believed to have followed the “Hockey Stick” pattern, characterized by a long-term cooling trend from the so-called “Medieval Warm Period” (broadly speaking, the 10th-mid 14th centuries) through the “Little Ice Age” (broadly speaking, the mid 15th-19th centuries), followed by a rapid warming during the 20th century that culminates in anomalous late 20th century warmth. The late 20th century warmth, at hemispheric or global scales, appears, from a number of recent peer-reviewed studies, to exceed the peak warmth of the “Medieval Warm Period”. Claims that global average temperatures during Medieval times were warmer than present-day are based on a number of false premises that a) confuse past evidence of drought/precipitation with temperature evidence, b) fail to disinguish regional from global-scale temperature variations, and c) use the entire “20th century” to describe “modern” conditions , fail to differentiate between relatively cool early 20th century conditions and the anomalously warm late 20th century conditions.

par Michael Mann (traduit par Thibault de Garidel)
C’est un des nombreux mythes populaires concernant les variations de température sur les siècles passés. A l’échelle globale ou hémispherique, il est admis que les températures de surface ont suivi une évolution en forme de “crosse de hockey” – (“hockey stick”), caractérisée par une longue tendance au refroidissement depuis “l’Optimum Climatique Médiéval” (grosso modo, du Xie au milieu du XIVie siècle) jusqu’au “Petit Age Glaciaire” (grosso modo du milieu du XVie au XIXie siècle), suivie d’un réchauffement rapide au XXie siècle qui culmine par les températures anormalement élevées de la fin du XXie siècle. Ces températures élevées de la fin du XXie siècle, aux échelles hémisphérique ou globale, apparaissent, d’après de nombreux travaux récents évalués par des pairs, supérieures à celles maximales de l’Optimum Médiéval.
Les assertions de températures moyennes globales plus élevées au Moyen Age que maintenant sont fondées sur un certain nombre de prémisses fausses qui (a) confondent les indicateurs de sécheresse/précipitation avec ceux de température, (b) ne font pas la différence entre des variations globales et régionales de température, et (c) utilisent tout le 20ie siecle pour définir les conditions ‘modernes’, ce qui empêche de différencier les conditions relativement fraiches du début du 20ie et celles anormalement chaudes de la fin du 20ie.

Filed Under: Climate Science, FAQ, Paleoclimate

OK, But we do know it was warmer than present 6000 years ago, don’t we? Sommes nous sûrs qu’il faisait plus chaud il y a 6000 ans ?

8 Dec 2004 by mike

This is yet another oft-repeated but problematic assertion based in this case on the mis-characterization of the so-called Mid-Holocene Climatic Optimum” or “Mid-Holocene Warm Period”. Paleoclimate experts now know that the mid-Holocene warmth centered roughly 8000 to 6000 years ago was probably restricted to high latitudes and certain seasons (summer in the Northern Hemisphere and winter in the southern hemisphere). Because much of the early paleoclimate evidence that was available (for example, fossil pollen assemblages) came from the Northern Hemisphere extratropics, and is largely reflective of summer conditions, decades ago some scientists believed that this was a time of globally warmer conditions. More abundant evidence now demonstrates, for example, that the tropical regions were cooler over much of the year.

par Michael Mann (traduit par Thibault de Garidel)

Cette assertion est très souvent répétée mais reste problématique en raison de la mauvaise caractérisation de cette période appelée ““Optimum climatique de l’Holocène moyen” ou “période chaude de l’Holocène moyen”. Les experts des paléoclimats, savent maintenant que cette phase chaude à l’Holocène (il y a approximativement 8000 à 6000 ans) était probablement limitée aux hautes latitudes et à certaines saisons (été dans l’hémisphère nord et hiver dans l’hémisphère sud). Comme la majorité des indicateurs du climat passé disponibles (comme par exemple, assemblages de pollens fossiles) provenaient des latitudes moyennes à hautes de l’hémisphère Nord, et étaient diagnostiques des condition climatiques d’été, certains scientifiques ont cru que cette période de temps était plus chaude globalement. Cependant, désormais, de nombreuses études montrent que les régions tropicales étaient plus fraîches pendant la plus grande partie de l’année.
(suite…)

[Read more…] about OK, But we do know it was warmer than present 6000 years ago, don’t we? Sommes nous sûrs qu’il faisait plus chaud il y a 6000 ans ?

Filed Under: Climate Science, FAQ, Paleoclimate

Are Temperature Trends affected by Economic Activity?

8 Dec 2004 by rasmus

In a recent paper, McKitrick and Michaels (2004, or “MM04”) argue that non-climatic factors such as economic activity may contaminate climate station data, and thus, may render invalid any estimates of surface tem­perature trends derived from these data. They propose that surface temperature trends may be linked to various local economic factors, such as national coal consumption, income per capita, GPD growth rate, literacy rates, and whether or not temperature stations were located within the former Soviet Union. If their conclusions were correct, this would hold implications for the reliability of the modern surface temperature record, an important piece of evidence indicating 20th century surface warming. However, numerous flaws with their analysis, some of them absolutely fundamental, render their conclusions invalid.

[Read more…] about Are Temperature Trends affected by Economic Activity?

Filed Under: Instrumental Record

The Surface Temperature Record and the Urban Heat Island

6 Dec 2004 by group

There are quite a few reasons to believe that the surface temperature record – which shows a warming of approximately 0.6°-0.8°C over the last century (depending on precisely how the warming trend is defined) – is essentially uncontaminated by the effects of urban growth and the Urban Heat Island (UHI) effect. These include that the land, borehole and marine records substantially agree; and the fact that there is little difference between the long-term (1880 to 1998) rural (0.70°C/century) and full set of station temperature trends (actually less at 0.65°C/century). This and other information lead the IPCC to conclude that the UHI effect makes at most a contribution of 0.05°C to the warming observed over the past century.

[Read more…] about The Surface Temperature Record and the Urban Heat Island

Filed Under: Instrumental Record

Recent Warming But No Trend in Galactic Cosmic Rays

6 Dec 2004 by rasmus

There is little evidence for a connection between solar activity (as inferred from trends in galactic cosmic rays) and recent global warming. Since the paper by Friis-Christensen and Lassen (1991), there has been an enhanced controversy about the role of solar activity for earth’s climate. Svensmark (1998) later proposed that changes in the inter-planetary magnetic fields (IMF) resulting from variations on the sun can affect the climate through galactic cosmic rays (GCR) by modulating earth’s cloud cover. Svensmark and others have also argued that recent global warming has been a result of solar activity and reduced cloud cover. Damon and Laut have criticized their hypothesis and argue that the work by both Friis-Christensen and Lassen and Svensmark contain serious flaws. For one thing, it is clear that the GCR does not contain any clear and significant long-term trend (e.g. Fig. 1, but also in papers by Svensmark).

[Read more…] about Recent Warming But No Trend in Galactic Cosmic Rays

Filed Under: Climate Science, Sun-earth connections

The Arctic Climate Impact Assessment

5 Dec 2004 by Stefan

In early November 2004 the results of the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment (ACIA) were published, a uniquely detailed regional study compiled by 300 scientists over 3 years. The study describes the ongoing climate change in the Arctic and its consequences: rising temperatures, loss of sea ice, unprecedented melting of the Greenland ice sheet, and many impacts on ecosystems, animals and people. The ACIA is the first comprehensively researched, fully referenced, and independently reviewed evaluation of arctic climate change and its impacts for the region and for the world.

Sadly, in recent years we have become accustomed to a ritual in which the publication of each new result on anthropogenic climate change is greeted by a flurry of activity from industry-funded lobby groups, think tanks and PR professionals, who try to discredit the science and confuse the public about global warming.

[Read more…] about The Arctic Climate Impact Assessment

Filed Under: Arctic and Antarctic, Climate Science, Paleoclimate

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 126
  • Page 127
  • Page 128
  • Page 129
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML climate magic?
  • Unforced variations: Jan 2026
  • 1.5ºC and all that
  • Unforced Variations: Dec 2025
  • Who should pay?
  • Site updates etc.

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Data on 1.5ºC and all that
  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Jan 2026
  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Jan 2026
  • Data on 1.5ºC and all that
  • Piotr on AI/ML climate magic?
  • Nigelj on 1.5ºC and all that
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced variations: Jan 2026
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Jan 2026
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced variations: Jan 2026
  • Ron R. on Unforced variations: Jan 2026
  • Steven Emmerson on Unforced variations: Jan 2026
  • JCM on Unforced variations: Jan 2026
  • Barton Paul Levenson on 1.5ºC and all that
  • Barton Paul Levenson on 1.5ºC and all that
  • Barton Paul Levenson on 1.5ºC and all that
  • Pete Best on 1.5ºC and all that
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced variations: Jan 2026
  • Data on 1.5ºC and all that
  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Jan 2026
  • Data on AI/ML climate magic?
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on Unforced variations: Jan 2026
  • Data on Unforced variations: Jan 2026
  • Piotr on 1.5ºC and all that
  • patrick o twentyseven on Unforced variations: Jan 2026
  • Data on Unforced variations: Jan 2026
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on 1.5ºC and all that
  • Ron R. on AI/ML climate magic?
  • Nigelj on 1.5ºC and all that
  • Nigelj on AI/ML climate magic?
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Jan 2026

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,392 posts

15 pages

249,558 comments

Copyright © 2026 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.