• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics

Blog – realclimate.org – All Posts

What ocean heating reveals about global warming

25 Sep 2013 by Stefan

The heat content of the oceans is growing and growing.  That means that the greenhouse effect has not taken a pause and the cold sun is not noticeably slowing global warming.

NOAA posts regularly updated measurements of the amount of heat stored in the bulk of the oceans.  For the upper 2000 m (deeper than that not much happens) it looks like this:

heat_content2000m

Change in the heat content in the upper 2000 m of the world’s oceans. Source: NOAA


[Read more…] about What ocean heating reveals about global warming

Filed Under: Climate modelling, Climate Science, El Nino, Instrumental Record, Oceans, skeptics

Paleoclimate: The End of the Holocene

16 Sep 2013 by Stefan

Translations: (Deutsch)

Recently a group of researchers from Harvard and Oregon State University has published the first global temperature reconstruction for the last 11,000 years – that’s the whole Holocene (Marcott et al. 2013). The results are striking and worthy of further discussion, after the authors have already commented on their results in this blog.

[Read more…] about Paleoclimate: The End of the Holocene

Filed Under: Climate Science

On mismatches between models and observations

13 Sep 2013 by Gavin

It is a truism that all models are wrong. Just as no map can capture the real landscape and no portrait the true self, numerical models by necessity have to contain approximations to the complexity of the real world and so can never be perfect replications of reality. Similarly, any specific observations are only partial reflections of what is actually happening and have multiple sources of error. It is therefore to be expected that there will be discrepancies between models and observations. However, why these arise and what one should conclude from them are interesting and more subtle than most people realise. Indeed, such discrepancies are the classic way we learn something new – and it often isn’t what people first thought of.
[Read more…] about On mismatches between models and observations

Filed Under: Climate modelling, Climate Science, Instrumental Record

Unforced variations: Sept. 2013

2 Sep 2013 by group

This month’s open thread… Expect pre-IPCC report discussion (SPM due on Sep 27, full report (pre-copy-editing) Sep 30th), analysis of this years Arctic ice cover minimum, and a host of the usual distractions.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

The inevitability of sea level rise

15 Aug 2013 by Stefan

Guest post by Anders Levermann [via The Conversation]

The Conversation
Small numbers can imply big things. Global sea level rose by a little less than 0.2 metres during the 20th century – mainly in response to the 0.8 °C of warming humans have caused through greenhouse gas emissions. That might not look like something to worry about. But there is no doubt that for the next century, sea level will continue to rise substantially. The multi-billion-dollar question is: by how much? [Read more…] about The inevitability of sea level rise

Filed Under: Climate Science

Unforced variations: August 2013

1 Aug 2013 by group

This month’s open thread.

Since there are two main topics (Advocacy and Methane bombs) buzzing around the blogo-twitter-sphere this week, perhaps those are our starters for ten… (Feel free to populate the comments with links to various commentaries – we will chime in as we find time).

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

Arctic misrepresentations

8 Jul 2013 by Gavin

At the weekend, Christopher Booker at the Daily Telegraph made another attempt (see previous) to downplay the obvious decreases in Arctic sea ice by (mis-)quoting a statement from Arctic oceanographer Ken Drinkwater and colleagues:
[Read more…] about Arctic misrepresentations

Filed Under: Arctic and Antarctic, Climate Science

AGU Chapman Conference on Climate Science Communication

8 Jul 2013 by Gavin

A couple of weeks ago, there was a small conference on Climate Science communication run by the AGU. Both Mike and I attended, but it was very notable that it wasn’t just scientists attending – there were also entertainers, psychologists, film-makers and historians. There were a lot of quite diverse perspectives and many discussions about the what’s, why’s and how’s of climate science communication.

There were a couple of notable features: the conference had a lively twitter hashtag (#climatechapman), and almost the entire proceedings were webcast live (schedule). The video from this has now been posted on YouTube in more bite-sized chunks.

While our own presentations (Mike here and Gavin here) are available, it is worth watching the presentations from people you might not have heard of, as well as a few from more established people. We’ll embed a few here, but please point out some of the other ones of interest in the comments.
[Read more…] about AGU Chapman Conference on Climate Science Communication

Filed Under: Climate Science, Communicating Climate

Unforced Variations: July 2013

1 Jul 2013 by group

This month’s open thread…

We have just updated the blog software, and are taking a little time to assess how up-to-date some the content is (including the theme, mobile theme, blogroll, about pages and the RC wiki etc.). So this might be a good time to chime in with your suggestions as well as discussing the latest climate science issues.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

A new experiment with science publication

28 Jun 2013 by rasmus

A while ago, I received a request to publish a paper on a post that I had written here on RealClimate, exposing the flaws in the analysis of Humlum et al., (2011).

Instead of writing a comment to one paper, however, I thought it might be useful to collect a sample of papers that I found unconvincing (usual suspects), and that have had a fairly high public profile.

[Read more…] about A new experiment with science publication

References

  1. O. Humlum, J. Solheim, and K. Stordahl, "Identifying natural contributions to late Holocene climate change", Global and Planetary Change, vol. 79, pp. 145-156, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2011.09.005

Filed Under: Climate Science, Reviews, Scientific practice, skeptics

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 53
  • Page 54
  • Page 55
  • Page 56
  • Page 57
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 139
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Time and Tide Gauges wait for no Voortman
  • Lil’ NAS Express
  • DOE CWG Report “Moot”?

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Ray Ladbury on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Ray Ladbury on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • zebra on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • MA Rodger on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • DavidD on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • zebra on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Barton Paul Levenson on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Ken Towe on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Killian on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • elia on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Annie Leymarie on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Karsten V. Johansen on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Mo Hummus on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Keith Woollard on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Keith Woollard on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Mo Yunus on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Jean-Pierre Demol on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Bart on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Mo Yunus on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • John Mashey on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Keith Woollard on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Keith Woollard on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Ken Towe on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Mo Yunus on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Mo Yunus on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Kevin Trenberth on High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,384 posts

11 pages

247,576 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.