• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / 2019 / Archives for February 2019

Archives for February 2019

The best case for worst case scenarios

26 Feb 2019 by Gavin

The “end of the world” or “good for you” are the two least likely among the spectrum of potential outcomes.

Stephen Schneider

Scientists have been looking at best, middling and worst case scenarios for anthropogenic climate change for decades. For instance, Stephen Schneider himself took a turn back in 2009. And others have postulated both far more rosy and far more catastrophic possibilities as well (with somewhat variable evidentiary bases).

[Read more…] about The best case for worst case scenarios

References

  1. S. Schneider, "The worst-case scenario", Nature, vol. 458, pp. 1104-1105, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/4581104a

Filed Under: Climate impacts, Climate modelling, Climate Science, Communicating Climate, IPCC, Reporting on climate, Scientific practice

Update day

7 Feb 2019 by Gavin

So Wednesday was temperature series update day. The HadCRUT4, NOAA NCEI and GISTEMP time-series were all updated through to the end of 2018 (slightly delayed by the federal government shutdown). Berkeley Earth and the MSU satellite datasets were updated a couple of weeks ago. And that means that everyone gets to add a single additional annual data point to their model-observation comparison plots!

[Read more…] about Update day

Filed Under: Climate modelling, Climate Science, Instrumental Record, Model-Obs Comparisons

Forced Responses: Feb 2019

1 Feb 2019 by group

A bimonthly thread on societal responses to climate change. Note that there is another open thread for climate science topics. Please stick to specifics as opposed to arguments about ethics, politics or morality in general.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread, Solutions

Unforced variations: Feb 2019

1 Feb 2019 by group

This month’s open thread for climate science discussions.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Unforced Variations: Aug 2025

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Scott on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • BJ Chippindale on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Killian on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Martin Smith on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Killian on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Russell Seitz on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Martin Smith on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Nigelj on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Nigelj on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Nigelj on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • b fagan on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Scott on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Ray Ladbury on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • nigelj on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • David on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • nigelj on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • David on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Mal Adapted on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Ken Towe on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Ken Towe on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • MA Rodger on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Ken Towe on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Mal Adapted on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Mal Adapted on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Mal Adapted on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,379 posts

11 pages

246,622 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.