• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Archives for Climate Science

Climate Science

On Yet Another False Claim by McIntyre and McKitrick

6 Jan 2005 by mike

McIntyre and McKitrick (MM), in one of their many false claims regarding the Mann et al (MBH98) temperature reconstruction, assert that the “Hockey Stick” shape of the reconstruction is an artifact of the “non-centered” Principal Components Analysis (PCA) convention used by MBH98 in representing the North American International Tree Ring Data Bank (ITRDB) data series. We already demonstrated the falsehood of this assertion here by showing (a) that the hockey stick pattern emerges using either the MM (centered) or MBH98 (non-centered) PCA conventions, but was censored by MM through an inappropriate application of selection rules for determining the number of Principal Component (PC) to retain, (b) that use of the correct number of PC series (5) to be kept with the MM (centered) convention retains the characteristic “Hockey Stick” pattern as an important predictor, and yields essentially the same temperature reconstruction as MBH98, and finally [Read more…] about On Yet Another False Claim by McIntyre and McKitrick

Filed Under: Paleoclimate, Supplemental data

Imprecision of the Phrase “Global Warming”

31 Dec 2004 by Gavin

Guest Contribution by Michael Tobis, University of Chicago

Consider the possibility that the expression “global warming” has become a problematic one, and that it might be best to avoid it.

A big part of the public confusion about climate change comes from sloppy language. The naysayers prey on this confusion, very much as their peers prey on the phrase “evolutionary theory” to suggest that “evolution, well, it’s just a theory”.

[Read more…] about Imprecision of the Phrase “Global Warming”

Filed Under: Climate Science

Will-full ignorance

26 Dec 2004 by eric

It is not worthwhile for RealClimate to post a response to each misinformed newspaper commentary on climate change that we come across. However, George Will’s recent article in the Washington post (in which he praises Michael Crichton’s State of Fear) perhaps deserves special attention because Will is so widely read and respected. We find it disappointing that Will appears not to have bothered looking up the most basic facts before writing his article. See also our earlier post on the George Will article.

We have already posted detailed responses to State of Fear. Here, we respond briefly to the points Will tries to make. The italics are direct quotes from his article.

[Read more…] about Will-full ignorance

Filed Under: Climate Science

George Will-misled and misleading

24 Dec 2004 by Ray Bradley

In a Washington Post Opinion article on December 22, 2004, commentator George Will applauds Michael Crichton’s new book, State of Fear. We have already pointed out some of the more egregious scientific errors in Crichton’s novel (see Michael Crichton’s State of Confusion ). Mr. Will compounds those errors and fails his own standards by making statements that are truly “innocent of information but overflowing with certitudes”.

[Read more…] about George Will-misled and misleading

Filed Under: Climate Science

A Welcoming Nature

22 Dec 2004 by Gavin

Getting a serious paper into Nature or Science is deservedly hard. Getting a mention for your climate blog is apparently a little easier!

We are of course collectively very pleased that Nature has welcomed the RealClimate.org effort so forthrightly. We only hope that we will be able to match up to their expectations. As with anything new, done by inexperienced first-timers who really should be concentrating on their actual jobs, there are bound to be teething problems. One, alluded to in the editorial and accompanying news story, is who gets to decide what’s posted, and getting the balance right between inclusiveness and clarity.

[Read more…] about A Welcoming Nature

Filed Under: Climate Science, In the News

How do we know that recent CO2 increases are due to human activities?

22 Dec 2004 by eric

Translations: (Svenska) (Español) (Français)

Note:This is an update to an earlier post, which many found to be too technical. The original, and a series of comments on it, can be found here. See also a more recent post here for an even less technical discussion.

Over the last 150 years, carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations have risen from 280 to nearly 380 parts per million (ppm). The fact that this is due virtually entirely to human activities is so well established that one rarely sees it questioned. Yet it is quite reasonable to ask how we know this.

[Read more…] about How do we know that recent CO2 increases are due to human activities?

Filed Under: Climate Science, FAQ, Greenhouse gases, Paleoclimate

Just what is this Consensus anyway?

22 Dec 2004 by group

Translations: (Français)

We’ve used the term “consensus” here a bit recently (see our earlier post on the subject), without ever really defining what we mean by it. In normal practice, there is no great need to define it – no science depends on it. But it’s useful to record the core that most scientists agree on, for public presentation. The consensus that exists is that of the IPCC reports, in particular the working group I report (there are three WG’s. By “IPCC”, people tend to mean WG I). Fortunately that report is available online for all to read at http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/. It’s a good idea to realise that though the IPCC report contains the consensus, it didn’t form it. The IPCC process was supposed to be – and is – a summary of the science (as available at the time). Because they did their job well, it really is a good review/summary/synthesis.

[Read more…] about Just what is this Consensus anyway?

Filed Under: Climate Science, FAQ

Fox News gets it wrong

18 Dec 2004 by Ray Bradley

In a December 17th Fox News story (See full report here) Steven Milloy comments on a lecture by Lonnie Thompson at the Annual meeting of the American Geophysical Union in San Francisco. He uses a common ploy of truncating what Thompson said, to ensure that a quotation fits with his message. According to Milloy, Thompson said, “Any prudent person would agree that we don’t yet understand the complexities with the climate system.” But what he actually said was “Any prudent person would agree that we don’t yet understand the complexities with the climate system and, since we don’t, we should be extremely cautious in how much we ‘tweak’ the system.” (see full press release here). Such manipulations are designed so that Milloy can’t be accused of misquoting, but clearly, he completely contorts Thompson’s point. Milloy also misunderstands the science.

[Read more…] about Fox News gets it wrong

Filed Under: Climate Science

Statistical analysis of consensus

16 Dec 2004 by eric

Translations: (Français)

Is there really “consensus” in the scientific community on the reality of anthropogenic climate change? As N. Oreskes points out in a recent article in Science, that is itself a question that can be addressed scientificially. Oreskes took a sampling of 928 articles on climate change, selected objectively (using the key phrase “global climate change”) from the published peer-reviewed scientific literature. Oreskes concluded that of those articles (about 75% of them) that deal with the question at all, 100% (all of them) support the consensus view that a significant fraction of recent climate change is due to human activities. Of course, there are undoubtedly some articles that have been published in the peer-reviewed literature that disagree with this position and that Oreskes’s survey missed, but the fact that her sample didn’t [Read more…] about Statistical analysis of consensus

Filed Under: Climate Science

Michael Crichton’s State of Confusion II: Return of the Science

15 Dec 2004 by mike

Our first post on Crichton’s new novel “State of Fear” hits most of the key points, though there are a few more errors in the book that we hope to expand upon in future posts.

But for those of you uninterested in buying and reading the book, you can actually find a similar-minded opinion piece by Crichton criticizing climate science (and everything from SETI and the “Drake Equation” to Carl Sagan in the process) here in the public domain.

[Read more…] about Michael Crichton’s State of Confusion II: Return of the Science

Filed Under: Climate modelling, Climate Science, Greenhouse gases, Instrumental Record

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 123
  • Page 124
  • Page 125
  • Page 126
  • Page 127
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • National Climate Assessment links
  • Ocean circulation going South?
  • Melange à Trois
  • Unforced variations: July 2025
  • Unforced variations: Jun 2025
  • Predicted Arctic sea ice trends over time

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Barry E Finch on Unforced variations: July 2025
  • prl on Unforced variations: July 2025
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced variations: July 2025
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced variations: July 2025
  • nigelj on Unforced variations: July 2025
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced variations: July 2025
  • Ray Ladbury on Unforced variations: July 2025
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced variations: July 2025
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced variations: July 2025
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Unforced variations: July 2025
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced variations: July 2025
  • nigelj on Unforced variations: July 2025
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced variations: July 2025
  • Ron R. on Unforced variations: July 2025
  • David on Unforced variations: July 2025
  • CherylJosie on Unforced variations: July 2025
  • John Pollack on Unforced variations: July 2025
  • CherylJosie on Unforced variations: July 2025
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Unforced variations: July 2025
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced variations: July 2025

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,371 posts

11 pages

244,964 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.