• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Archives for Communicating Climate / Reporting on climate

Reporting on climate

Debate in the noise

15 Jun 2015 by Stefan

Last week there was an international media debate on climate data which appeared to be rather surreal to me. It was claimed that the global temperature data had so far shown a “hiatus” of global warming from 1998-2012, which was now suddenly gone after a data correction. So what happened?

One of the data centers that compile the data on global surface temperatures – NOAA – reported in the journal Science on an update of their data. Some artifacts due to changed measurement methods (especially for sea surface temperatures) were corrected and additional data of previously not included weather stations were added. All data centers are continually working to improve their database and they therefore occasionally present version updates of their global series (NASA data are currently at version 3, the British Hadley Centre data at version 4). There is nothing unusual about this, and the corrections are in the range of a few hundredths of a degree – see Figure 1. This really is just about fine details. [Read more…] about Debate in the noise

Filed Under: Climate Science, Communicating Climate, Instrumental Record, IPCC, Reporting on climate

Thoughts on 2014 and ongoing temperature trends

22 Jan 2015 by Gavin

Last Friday, NASA GISS and NOAA NCDC had a press conference and jointly announced the end-of-year analysis for the 2014 global surface temperature anomaly which, in both analyses, came out top. As you may have noticed, this got much more press attention than their joint announcement in 2013 (which wasn’t a record year).

In press briefings and interviews I contributed to, I mostly focused on two issues – that 2014 was indeed the warmest year in those records (though by a small amount), and the continuing long-term trends in temperature which, since they are predominantly driven by increases in greenhouse gases, are going to continue and hence produce (on a fairly regular basis) continuing record years. Response to these points has been mainly straightforward, which is good (if sometimes a little surprising), but there have been some interesting issues raised as well…
[Read more…] about Thoughts on 2014 and ongoing temperature trends

Filed Under: Climate Science, El Nino, Instrumental Record, Reporting on climate

Ten Years of RealClimate: Where now?

14 Dec 2014 by group

rc10The landscape for science blogging, the public discourse on climate and our own roles in the scientific community have all changed radically over the last 10 years. Blogging is no longer something that stands apart from professional communications, the mainstream media or new online start-ups. The diversity of voices online has also increased widely: scientists blogging and interacting directly with the public via Twitter and Facebook are much more prevalent than in 2004. The conversations have also changed, and (for the most part) have become more nuanced. And a bunch of early career researchers with enthusiasm, time to spare and things to say, have morphed into institute directors and administrators with lots of new pressures. Obviously, blogging frequency has decreased in the last year or so in response to these pressures and this raises the question: where does RealClimate go now?

[Read more…] about Ten Years of RealClimate: Where now?

Filed Under: Climate Science, Communicating Climate, Reporting on climate

Recent global warming trends: significant or paused or what?

4 Dec 2014 by Stefan

As the World Meteorological Organisation WMO has just announced that “The year 2014 is on track to be the warmest, or one of the warmest years on record”, it is timely to have a look at recent global temperature changes.

I’m going to use Kevin Cowtan’s nice interactive temperature plotting and trend calculation tool to provide some illustrations. I will be using the HadCRUT4 hybrid data, which have the most sophisticated method to fill data gaps in the Arctic with the help of satellites, but the same basic points can be illustrated with other data just as well.

Let’s start by looking at the full record, which starts in 1979 since the satellites come online there (and it’s not long after global warming really took off).

trend1Fig. 1. Global temperature 1979 to present – monthly values (crosses), 12-months running mean (red line) and linear trend line with uncertainty (blue) [Read more…] about Recent global warming trends: significant or paused or what?

Filed Under: Climate Science, Communicating Climate, Instrumental Record, Reporting on climate, skeptics

A failure in communicating the impact of new findings

6 Dec 2013 by rasmus

I was disappointed by the recent summary for policymakers (SPM) of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC) assessment report 5, now that I finally got around to read it. Not so much because of the science, but because the way it presented the science.

The report was written by top scientists, so what went wrong?

[Read more…] about A failure in communicating the impact of new findings

Filed Under: Climate Science, Communicating Climate, IPCC, Reporting on climate

Statistics and Climate

18 Nov 2013 by rasmus

Do different climate models give different results? And if so, why? The answer to these questions will increase our understanding of the climate models, and potentially the physical phenomena and processes present in the climate system.

We now have many different climate models, many different methods, and get a range of different results. They provide what we call ‘multi-model‘ and ‘multi-method‘ ensembles. But how do we make sense out of all this information?

[Read more…] about Statistics and Climate

Filed Under: Climate Science, Reporting on climate, Scientific practice, statistics

From global climate change to local consequences

3 Nov 2013 by rasmus

Some will be luckier than others when it comes to climate change. The effects of a climate change on me will depend on where I live. In some regions, changes may not be as noticeable as in others. So what are the impacts in my region?

[Read more…] about From global climate change to local consequences

Filed Under: Climate impacts, Climate modelling, Climate Science, Communicating Climate, IPCC, Reporting on climate

A new European report on climate extremes is out

26 Oct 2013 by rasmus

A new report on extreme climate events in Europe is just published: ‘Extreme Weather Events in Europe: preparing for climate change adaptation‘. It was launched in Oslo on October 24th by the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, and the report is now available online.

Front cover of 'Extreme Weather Events in Europe: preparing for climate change adaptation'
Front cover of ‘Extreme Weather Events in Europe:
preparing for climate change adaptation’

What’s new? The new report provides information that is more specific to Europe than the SREX report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and incorporate phenomena that have not been widely covered.

It provides some compelling information drawn from the insurance industry, and indeed, a representative from Munich Re participated in writing this report. There is also material on convective storms, hail, lightening, and cold snaps, and the report provides a background on extreme value statistics, risk analysis, impacts, and adaptation.

[Read more…] about A new European report on climate extremes is out

Filed Under: Climate impacts, Climate Science, Communicating Climate, Reporting on climate, Reviews

Should regional climate models take the blame?

6 Apr 2013 by rasmus

Kerr (2013) recently provided a critical review of regional climate models (“RCMs”). I think his views have caused a stir in the regional climate model community. So what’s the buzz all about?

RCMs provide important input to many climate services, for which there is a great deal of vested interest on all levels. On the international stage, high-level talks lead to the establishment of a Global Framework for Climate Services (GFCS) during the World Climate Conference 3 (WCC3) in Geneva 2009.

[Read more…] about Should regional climate models take the blame?

References

  1. R.A. Kerr, "Forecasting Regional Climate Change Flunks Its First Test", Science, vol. 339, pp. 638-638, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.339.6120.638

Filed Under: Climate impacts, Climate modelling, Climate Science, Reporting on climate, statistics

Movie review: SWITCH

2 Apr 2013 by raypierre

This year, the Geological Society of America is rolling out their SWITCH Energy Awareness campaign . The centerpiece of the campaign is a documentary film, SWITCH, which purports to be about the need for a transformation in the world’s energy systems. Recently, I attended the Chicago premier of the film, presented as part of the Environmental Film Series of the Lutheran School of Theology. I had high hopes for this film. They were disappointed. Given the mismatch between what the movie promises and what it delivers, it would be more aptly titled, “BAIT AND SWITCH.”
Switch Still
[Read more…] about Movie review: SWITCH

Filed Under: Climate Science, Communicating Climate, Reporting on climate

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 13
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Are direct water vapor emissions endangering anyone?
  • The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • National Climate Assessment links
  • Ocean circulation going South?

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Gavin on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • nigelj on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Ray Ladbury on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Ray Ladbury on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • MA Rodger on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Radge Havers on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • John Pollack on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • John Pollack on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Ray Ladbury on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Ray Ladbury on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Pete Best on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Geoff Miell on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Chris G on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • David on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Steven Emmerson on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Tomáš Kalisz on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • JCM on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Radge Havers on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • MA Rodger on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Mr. Know It All on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • David on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,375 posts

11 pages

246,286 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.