• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics

Blog – realclimate.org – All Posts

What is new in European climate research?

18 Sep 2016 by rasmus

The EMS 2016 Venue
The EMS 2016 Venue

What did I learn from the 2016 annual European Meteorological Society (EMS) conference that last week was hosted in Trieste (Italy)?

[Read more…] about What is new in European climate research?

Filed Under: Climate conference report, Climate Science, Communicating Climate, RC Forum, Reporting on climate

Predicting annual temperatures a year ahead

16 Sep 2016 by Gavin

I have a post at Nate Silver’s 538 site on how we can predict annual surface temperature anomalies based on El Niño and persistence – including a (by now unsurprising) prediction for a new record in 2016 and a slightly cooler, but still very warm, 2017.

[Read more…] about Predicting annual temperatures a year ahead

Filed Under: Climate Science, El Nino, Instrumental Record, statistics

An update on mid-latitude cyclones and climate change

6 Sep 2016 by rasmus

Why is it so hard to say what the future North European climate will look like? A recent review paper by Shaw et al, 2016 explains the reason in persuasive terms.

[Read more…] about An update on mid-latitude cyclones and climate change

References

  1. T.A. Shaw, M. Baldwin, E.A. Barnes, R. Caballero, C.I. Garfinkel, Y. Hwang, C. Li, P.A. O'Gorman, G. Rivière, I.R. Simpson, and A. Voigt, "Storm track processes and the opposing influences of climate change", Nature Geoscience, vol. 9, pp. 656-664, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/NGEO2783

Filed Under: Climate Science

Unforced variations: Sep 2016

1 Sep 2016 by group

To come this month: Arctic sea ice minimum, decisions from the IPCC scoping meeting on a report focused on the 1.5ºC target, interesting paleo-climate science at #ICP12 and a chance to stop arguing about politics perhaps.

Usual rules apply.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

Australian silliness and July temperature records

16 Aug 2016 by Gavin

Some of you that follow my twitter account will have already seen this, but there was a particularly amusing episode of Q&A on Australian TV that pitted Prof. Brian Cox against a newly-elected politician who is known for his somewhat fringe climate ‘contrarian’ views. The resulting exchanges were fun:
[Read more…] about Australian silliness and July temperature records

Filed Under: Climate Science, El Nino, Instrumental Record

Unforced variations: Aug 2016

1 Aug 2016 by group

Sorry for the low rate of posts this summer. Lots of offline life going on. ;-)

Meantime, this paper by Hourdin et al on climate model tuning is very interesting and harks back to the FAQ we did on climate models a few years ago (Part I, Part II). Maybe it’s worth doing an update?

Some of you might also have seen some of the discussion of record temperatures in the first half of 2016. The model-observation comparison including the estimates for 2016 are below:




It seems like the hiatus hiatus will continue…

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

Unforced variations: July 2016

1 Jul 2016 by group

A week is a long time in politics climate science: Nonsense debunked in WaPo, begininngs of recovery in the ozone hole, revisiting the instrumental record constraints on climate sensitivity…

Lots of lessons there.

Usual rules apply.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

Boomerangs versus Javelins: The Impact of Polarization on Climate Change Communication

7 Jun 2016 by mike

Guest commentary by Jack Zhou, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University

For advocates of climate change action, communication on the issue has often meant “finding the right message” that will spur their audience to action and convince skeptics to change their minds. This is the notion that simply connecting climate change to the right issue domains or symbols will cut through the political gridlock on the issue. The difficulty then lies with finding these magic bullet messages, figuring out if they talk about climate change in the context of with national security or polar bears or passing down a clean environment to future generations.

On highly polarized issues like climate change, however, communicating across the aisle may be more difficult than simply finding the right message. Here, the worst case scenario is not simply a message failing to land and sending you back to the drawing board. Instead, any message that your audience disagrees with may polarize that audience even further in their skepticism, leaving you in a worse position than you began. As climate change has become an increasingly partisan issue in American politics, this means that convincing Republicans to reject the party line of climate skepticism may be easier said than done.
[Read more…] about Boomerangs versus Javelins: The Impact of Polarization on Climate Change Communication

Filed Under: Climate Science

Unforced Variations: June 2016

1 Jun 2016 by group

June already? Cripes…

Usual rules apply.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

Scientists getting organized to help readers sort fact from fiction in climate change media coverage

24 May 2016 by rasmus

Guest post by Emmanuel Vincent

While 2016 is on track to easily surpass 2015 as the warmest year on record, some headlines, in otherwise prestigious news outlets, are still claiming that “2015 Was Not Even Close To Hottest Year On Record” (Forbes, Jan 2016) or that the “Planet is not overheating…” (The Times of London, Feb 2016). Media misrepresentation confuses the public and prevents our policy makers from developing a well-informed perspective, and making evidence-based decisions.

Professor Lord Krebs recently argued in an opinion piece in The Conversation that “accurate reporting of science matters” and that it is part of scientists’ professional duty to “challenge poor media reporting on climate change”. He concluded that “if enough [scientists] do so regularly, [science reporting] will improve – to the benefit of scientists, the public and indeed journalism itself.”

This is precisely what a new project called Climate Feedback is doing: giving hundreds of scientists around the world the opportunity to not only challenge unscientific reporting of climate change, but also to highlight and support accurate science journalism.

[Read more…] about Scientists getting organized to help readers sort fact from fiction in climate change media coverage

Filed Under: Communicating Climate, Reporting on climate

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 39
  • Page 40
  • Page 41
  • Page 42
  • Page 43
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 140
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Koonin’s Continuing Calumnies
  • Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • 2025 Updates
  • A peek behind the curtain…

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Tomáš Kalisz on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • patrick o twentyseven on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Nigelj on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Nigelj on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Ray Ladbury on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Ray Ladbury on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Ray Ladbury on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Joseph O'Sullivan on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Piotr on 2025 Updates
  • Richard Creager on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Atomsk's Sanakan on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Susan Anderson on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Thomas Fuller on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Barton Paul Levenson on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Barton Paul Levenson on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Martin Smith on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Nigelj on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Ron R. on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Nigelj on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Nigelj on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Data on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Nigelj on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Joseph O'Sullivan on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Ron R. on Unforced variations: Feb 2026

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,398 posts

15 pages

250,405 comments

Copyright © 2026 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.