• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / 2017 / Archives for July 2017

Archives for July 2017

Joy plots for climate change

22 Jul 2017 by Gavin

This is joy as in ‘Joy Division’, not as in actual fun.

Many of you will be familiar with the iconic cover of Joy Division’s Unknown Pleasures album, but maybe fewer will know that it’s a plot of signals from a pulsar (check out this Scientific American article on the history). The length of the line is matched to the frequency of the pulsing so that successive pulses are plotted almost on top of each other. For many years this kind of plot did not have a well-known designation until, in fact, April this year:

I hereby propose that we call these "joy plots" #rstats https://t.co/uuLGpQLAwY

— Jenny Bryan (@JennyBryan) April 25, 2017

So “joy plots” it is.

[Read more…] about Joy plots for climate change

Filed Under: Climate Science, Communicating Climate, Instrumental Record

The climate has always changed. What do you conclude?

20 Jul 2017 by Stefan

Probably everyone has heard this argument, presented as objection against the findings of climate scientists on global warming: “The climate has always changed!” And it is true: climate has changed even before humans began to burn fossil fuels. So what can we conclude from that?

A quick quiz

Do you conclude…

(1) that humans cannot change the climate?

(2) that we do not know whether humans are to blame for global warming?

(3) that global warming will not have any severe consequences?

(4) that we cannot stop global warming? [Read more…] about The climate has always changed. What do you conclude?

Filed Under: Climate Science, Communicating Climate, Paleoclimate, skeptics

Red team/Blue team Day 1

15 Jul 2017 by group

From Russell Seitz:

Filed Under: Climate Science

Climate Sensitivity Estimates and Corrections

12 Jul 2017 by Gavin

You need to be careful in inferring climate sensitivity from observations.

Two climate sensitivity stories this week – both related to how careful you need to be before you can infer constraints from observational data. (You can brush up on the background and definitions here). Both cases – a “Brief Comment Arising” in Nature (that I led) and a new paper from Proistosescu and Huybers (2017) – examine basic assumptions underlying previously published estimates of climate sensitivity and find them wanting.

[Read more…] about Climate Sensitivity Estimates and Corrections

References

  1. C. Proistosescu, and P.J. Huybers, "Slow climate mode reconciles historical and model-based estimates of climate sensitivity", Science Advances, vol. 3, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602821

Filed Under: Carbon cycle, Climate modelling, Climate Science, Greenhouse gases, Instrumental Record, Paleoclimate

Unforced variations: July 2017

1 Jul 2017 by group

So, big news this week: The latest update to the RSS lower troposphere temperatures (Zeke at Carbon Brief, J. Climate paper) and, of course, more chatter about the red team/blue team concept. Comments?

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Are direct water vapor emissions endangering anyone?
  • The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • National Climate Assessment links
  • Ocean circulation going South?

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Ron R. on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • patrick o twentyseven on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • Ron R. on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • b fagan on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • David on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Piotr on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Piotr on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • Tomáš Kalisz on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • Ken Towe on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Geoff Miell on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Silvia Leahu-Aluas on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • zebra on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Ken Towe on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • zebra on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Atomsk's Sanakan on The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • Rory Allen on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Rory Allen on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Rory Allen on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Silvia Leahu-Aluas on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Rory Allen on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Rory Allen on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,375 posts

11 pages

245,799 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.